The lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) is an interactive surface for cancer cells. This article aims to explore cancer cell-induced changes of LEC, and study the tumor-lymphatic endothelium interaction. Here, LECs were co-cultured with highly and poorly metastatic tongue cancer cells. The differences in biologic behaviors and gene expression profiles between them were examined. The results showed that LECs induced by highly metastatic cancer cells displayed abnormal biologic behaviors, and could secrete chemokines to promote the migration of cancer cells. Therefore, biologic properties and functional status of LECs in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) might be a positive factor in lymphatic dissemination. (Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 686-692) T he lymphatic system plays multiple roles in biologic processes, such as tissue homeostasis, supplemental circulation, and immune surveillance.(1,2) However, lymphatic vessels also act as conduits for metastatic tumor cells to escape from the primary tumor in most carcinomas.(3) Lymphatic spread is much more important in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTS-CC) than in other cancers, because they preferentially metastasize to roughly 400 lymph nodes in the cervical region, and lymph node metastasis is the strongest prognostic factor for survival of OTSCC patients. (4,5) Until now, the details of the process and molecular mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis have been unclear. Several reports on OTSCC showed that intratumoral and peritumoral lymphatic vessels were closely related to lymphatic metastasis, for they provided additional conduits for the dissemination of cancer cells. (6)(7)(8) Although lymphatic vessels constitute the most important channel of lymphatic spread, the lymphatic endothelium provides an interactive surface for cancer cells, and the ability of cancer cells to interact with the lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) is a key step in their invasion of the lymphatic system. Recent studies demonstrated that tumor-derived LECs had a remarkable degree of phenotypic plasticity.(9) Our previous study also showed that oral tongue cancer-induced LECs were more proliferative and had enhanced ability to organize capillary-like structures.(10) However, it is unclear whether altered LEC properties are consequences of the increased metastatic potential of tongue cancer cells, and whether these specific phenotypes contribute to the lymphatic dissemination of OTSCC.Tca8113 and LNMTca8113 cells had different potential of metastasis via lymphatic vessels. It was previously demonstrated that lymphangiogenesis in tumors derived from LNMTca8113 cells was promoted compared with that from Tca8113 cells. Moreover, it was confirmed that the number of micro-lymphatic branches in LNMTca8113 conditioned medium (CM) increased more rapidly than that in Tca8113 CM when induced lymphangioma were cultured in tumor conditioned medium (TCM) (accepted by Journal of West China Stamotology).In order to explore cancer cell-induced changes of LEC, and study the tumor-lymphatic endotheliu...