1964
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.136.b808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation among theΞ12*,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are compared with corresponding potentials extracted from a phenomenological model due to Lassila, Hull, Ruppel, McDonald, and Breit 2 and a phenomenological model due to Hamada and Johnston. 3 The results show good agreement, particularly in view of the fact that they use only nine adjustable parameters. Purely phenomenological studies of the nucleon-nucleon interaction have gone higher than thirty adjustable parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are compared with corresponding potentials extracted from a phenomenological model due to Lassila, Hull, Ruppel, McDonald, and Breit 2 and a phenomenological model due to Hamada and Johnston. 3 The results show good agreement, particularly in view of the fact that they use only nine adjustable parameters. Purely phenomenological studies of the nucleon-nucleon interaction have gone higher than thirty adjustable parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the SU(3)®SU(2) submultiplet of SU(6) these spurions can appear in the representation (1,3), (8,^), (27, .3), etc. The (Ij^)-type spurion corresponds to the completely symmetric interaction in SU(3), and the (8,J3) type to the symmetry-breaking interaction T 3 3 first introduced by Gell-Mann 9 and Okubo. 10 Now we assume that the spurions have the same transformation properties as certain appropriate elements of the adjoint representation (35) of SU (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) representations (e.g interpretation of the S/A branching ratio observed for F f (1385) decay in terms of the admixture of [27] representation with the dominant [10] representation (cf Martin & Wali 1963;. Wali & Warnock 1964;Gupta & Singh 1964;Konuma & Tomozawa 1964;Becchi, Eberle & Morpurgo 1964)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%