2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaparotomy After Pancreas Transplantation: Causes and Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
43
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our relaparotomy rates of 21.8% at one month and 34% overall are similar to those reported elsewhere [14,15,18]. Congruent with the recent �ndings of Manrique et al [14], reoperation was associated with poorer gra, but not patient, survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our relaparotomy rates of 21.8% at one month and 34% overall are similar to those reported elsewhere [14,15,18]. Congruent with the recent �ndings of Manrique et al [14], reoperation was associated with poorer gra, but not patient, survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Congruent with the recent �ndings of Manrique et al [14], reoperation was associated with poorer gra, but not patient, survival. e �ve-year patient, pancreas, and kidney survival aer SPK transplantation in this series are 94%, 77%, and 89%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, bleeding complications following pancreas transplant were among the leading causes for relaparotomy, second only to vascular graft thrombosis. In addition, relaparotomy following pancreas transplant has been associated with lower graft survival (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerrahi komplikasyonların hasta ve pankreas sağkalımı, parasal açıdan önemli bir sorun olduğu başka bir çalışmada gösterilmiştir (11). EBPN hastalarında yapılan başka bir çalışmada yeniden ameliyat oranının %32,2 olduğu gösterilmiştir (12). Çalışmamızda ise karın içi abse ve diğer nedenlerle yapılan yeniden ameliyat oranlarının anlamlı olmamakla birlikte PAK grubunda daha fazla olduğu (sırayla grup 1-2, %20-%45,8, p: 0,072) görüldü.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified