Summary The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of urological complications after kidney transplantation operation. Nine‐hundred and sixty‐five patients received a kidney transplant between 2000 and 2006. In total, 58 (6.01%) developed urological complications, including urinary leakage (n = 15, 1.55%), stenosis (n = 29, 3%), vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) (n = 12, 1.2%), calculi (n = 1, 0.1%) and parenchymal fistulae (n = 1, 0.1%). Urinary leakage cases were treated by ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) via a double‐J stent and stenosis cases by UNS. Fenestration was performed in patients developing lymphoceles and unresponsive to percutaneous drainage. VUR treatment was performed by ureteroneocystostomy revision or UNS. Stent usage during ureteric reimplantation was observed to reduce urinary leakage. Surgical complication rates in renal transplantation recipients according to donor type (living versus cadaveric) and the status of stent use (with stent versus without stent) were 5.53% vs. 7.27% (P = 0.064) and 5.24% vs. 20% (P < 0.01) respectively. No recurrence, graft loss or death was seen after these interventions. Comparison of recipients with and without urological complication showed that there was no difference between groups (P > 0.05) with respect to last creatinine level. No graft or patient loss was associated with urological complications. Urological complications that can be surgically corrected should be aggressively treated by experienced surgeons and graft loss avoided.

There is an improvement of endothelial function as assessed by FMD of the brachial artery after RTx in HD patients. This may be attributed to the elimination of uraemic toxins by successful RTx.

No abstract

No abstract

The growing imbalance between the number of cadaveric organ donors and recipients has led to an increasing use of high-risk donors as an option to expand the donor pool. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with the use of older liver (donor>50 yr of age) allografts. The medical records, postreperfusion biopsies and laboratory results were reviewed of the 393 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation between 1986 and 1997. The outcome of the 61 patients who received older livers (OL) was compared to that of the other 332 recipients. Increasing use of OL was evident from 1992 onwards. Recipients of OL were older than recipients of younger livers (YL, p<0.001) and more commonly had underlying chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) or fulminant hepatic failure (p<0.05). Patient and allograft survival were only slightly less in recipients of OL versus YL (p=NS). Although postperfusion biopsies showed more damage in OL than YL allografts (p<0.05), this was not associated with increased primary graft failure. OL allografts can be transplanted with acceptable results into recipients without the concern of early allograft loss. SUMMARY OF ARTICLE: This report of one centre's experience with 61 recipients of older donor liver allografts identifies recipient factors that may also have a negative impact on allograft outcome. These factors include a diagnosis of either CVH or fulminant hepatic failure at the time of transplantation. Postreperfusion biopsies of older donor allografts tend to show more damage, but this is not associated with primary non-function.