2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-99402016000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relações metionina + cistina: lisina digestíveis para codornas de corte machos em fase de terminação

Abstract: RESUMOCom o objetivo de estimar as melhores relações metionina + cistina: lisina digestíveis para codornas de corte machos durante os períodos de 22 a 28 e 29 a 35 dias de idade foram desenvolvidos dois experimentos. As aves foram submetidas a uma ração basal deficiente em metionina + cistina digestível, sendo esta suplementada com cinco níveis de DL-Metionina, em substituição ao ácido glutâmico e amido, resultando nas seguintes relações metionina + cistina: lisina digestíveis: 0,68; 0,73; 0,78; 0,83 e 0,88. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They received diets till the 20 th and 27 th days of age following requirements by Silva e Costa (2009), except for ratio methionine + cysteine, according to Castro (2014). Quails of the second assay were not the same as those used in the first assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They received diets till the 20 th and 27 th days of age following requirements by Silva e Costa (2009), except for ratio methionine + cysteine, according to Castro (2014). Quails of the second assay were not the same as those used in the first assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, CV i is the coefficient of variation between plot sizes X i ; X i is the plot size in basic units; X c is the optimum plot size in basic units; P is the coefficient of variation on the plateau; β 0 is the intercept; β 1 is the angular coefficient; and εi is the random error associated with CV i (Castro et al, 2016). The ratio between the optimum plot size and plateau formation was determined.…”
Section: Models For Estimation Of Experimental Plot Sizementioning
confidence: 99%