2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-020-00846-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rekonstruktion großer osteochondraler Defekte des distalen Femurs und der proximalen Tibia

Abstract: Rekonstruktion großer osteochondraler Defekte des distalen Femurs und der proximalen Tibia Anpassung frisch gefrorener Allografts unter Zuhilfenahme 3D-gedruckter Kunststoffmodelle Hintergrund Offene Frakturen des Kniegelenks mit signifikantem Verlust an osteochondraler Substanz kommen bei jungen Patienten vergleichsweise selten vor, haben jedoch meist fatale Konsequenzen. Aufgrund des hohen Aktivitätslevels und des funktionellen Anspruchs stellt die Behandlung solcher Fälle den Chirurgen vor große Herausforde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation with a coexisting shaft fracture at a distal femoral epiphyseal defect has not been described in the literature to date. Therefore, it required an innovative approach and an individual technical solution to this problem [ 68 , 69 , 70 ]. These actions allowed us, first of all, to shorten the time of immobilization and earlier commencement of rehabilitation to faster recovery of the flexion and extension movement functions in the knee joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation with a coexisting shaft fracture at a distal femoral epiphyseal defect has not been described in the literature to date. Therefore, it required an innovative approach and an individual technical solution to this problem [ 68 , 69 , 70 ]. These actions allowed us, first of all, to shorten the time of immobilization and earlier commencement of rehabilitation to faster recovery of the flexion and extension movement functions in the knee joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%