2004
DOI: 10.1038/nature02349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejuvenation of the lithosphere by the Hawaiian plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
203
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
14
203
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The steepness of the rare-earth element slopes indicates melting within the stability field of garnet lherzolite or melting to small degrees within the stability field of spinel lherzolite (Hauri et al, 1994;Salters et al, 2002), as to be expected to occur beneath an old tectonic plate where the bottom of the lithosphere (e.g. Li et al, 2004) is near the garnet to spinel transition (Kogiso et al, 1998;Robinson and Wood, 1998;Klemme and O'Neill, 2000).…”
Section: Trace Elements and Fractionation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steepness of the rare-earth element slopes indicates melting within the stability field of garnet lherzolite or melting to small degrees within the stability field of spinel lherzolite (Hauri et al, 1994;Salters et al, 2002), as to be expected to occur beneath an old tectonic plate where the bottom of the lithosphere (e.g. Li et al, 2004) is near the garnet to spinel transition (Kogiso et al, 1998;Robinson and Wood, 1998;Klemme and O'Neill, 2000).…”
Section: Trace Elements and Fractionation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a discontinuity at the base of the lithosphere has been observed in receiver function studies (Collins et al, 2002;Li et al, 2004;Vinnik et al, 2005), with whole mantle ScS reverberations (Courtier et al, 2007;Gaherty et al, 1996;Revenaugh and Jordan, 1991), and with multiple S waveforms (Tan and Helmberger, 2007). No discontinuity is expected from temperature sensitivity alone and there is no indication that the depth of the discontinuity is dependent on the age of the seafloor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, basalt dated to 56.4 ± 5 Ma (Kulp, 1963;Lincoln and Schlanger, 1991) recovered from 1267 m below Enewetak's rim (Ladd and Schlanger, 1960) suggests a long-term mean subsidence rate between~20.6 and 24.6 m/Myr. Plate cooling models (Stein and Stein, 1992) predict a subsidence rate of 14-18 m/Myr over the past 8.5 Ma for Enewetak, assuming thermal reset of the crust during island formation (Detrick and Crough, 1978;Li et al, 2004). Likewise, a mean subsidence rate of 19.5 m/Myr since the late Cretaceous can be estimated from cores drilled on Wodejebato guyot (submerged 1485 mbsl), 250 km east of Enewetak (Larson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Subsidence and Rim Dissolution Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%