2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rejecting another pains the self: The impact of perceived future rejection

Abstract: The current investigation examined whether people would experience a higher level of pain after rejecting another person, especially for those high in evaluative concern, through increased perceptions of future rejection. Three experiments provide converging support to these predictions. After reliving a past rejecting experience (Experiments 1 and 2) and concurrently rejecting another person (Experiment 3), the source of rejection experienced a higher level of pain than participants in the control conditions.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McGill Pain Questionnaire -Short Form: To measure participants' experience of social pain due to social rejection, participants completed a well-validated measure of both sensory and affective pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Melzack, 1987). Previous research on social rejection has shown that social rejection increases reports of the affective subscale of this measure, and have effectively used it as an index of social pain (e.g., Chen, Poon, Bernstein, & Teng, 2014;Chen, Williams, Fitness, & Newtown, 2008). This measure includes 15 adjectives regarding the subjective intensity of one's current pain levels, 0 (none) to 3 (severe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGill Pain Questionnaire -Short Form: To measure participants' experience of social pain due to social rejection, participants completed a well-validated measure of both sensory and affective pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Melzack, 1987). Previous research on social rejection has shown that social rejection increases reports of the affective subscale of this measure, and have effectively used it as an index of social pain (e.g., Chen, Poon, Bernstein, & Teng, 2014;Chen, Williams, Fitness, & Newtown, 2008). This measure includes 15 adjectives regarding the subjective intensity of one's current pain levels, 0 (none) to 3 (severe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on social rejection has shown that social rejection increases reports of the affective subscale of this measure, and have effectively used it as an index of social pain (e.g., Chen, Poon, Bernstein, & Teng, 2014; Chen, Williams, Fitness, & Newtown, 2008). This measure includes 15 adjectives regarding the subjective intensity of one’s current pain levels, 0 (none) to 3 (severe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, social rejection is not always punitive: there are times when people cannot accept all invitations or wish to avoid a social encounter but are not trying to injure the target ( Freedman et al, 2016 ). In cases where punishment is not the goal, rejectors often find it difficult and unpleasant to engage in social rejection ( Folkes, 1982 ; Baumeister et al, 1993 ; Kets de Vries and Balazs, 1997 ; Ciarocco et al, 2001 ; Clair and Dufresne, 2004 ; Grunberg et al, 2006 ; Chen et al, 2014 ; however, see Zadro et al, 2005 for evidence that ostracism may be less difficult if you have peers also engaging in ostracism) and want to protect targets’ feelings ( Goffman, 1967 ; Folkes, 1982 ; Baumeister et al, 1993 ; Besson et al, 1998 ; Tom Tong and Walther, 2010 ). But almost nothing is known about how rejectors can protect targets’ feelings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%