Reinterpretation or Contestation of International Law in Cyberspace?

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, international law has increasingly been challenged by states and other actors. Specific norms have also been challenged in their application by new realities and obstacles. This article focuses on these challenges as they arise from the development of cyberspace and cyber operations, and offers an overview of the main questions arising with regard to the application of international law to cyber operations. By analysing the application of the existing norms of international law to cyber operations as well as identifying their limits, the article offers an accurate lens through which to study the contestation or process of reinterpretation of some norms of international law. The objective of the article is not to deliver a comprehensive analysis of how the norms of international law apply to cyber operations but to provide an overview of the key points and issues linked to the applicability and application of the norms as well as elements of contextualisation, notably after the failure of the 2016–17 United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. The article comprises three parts. The first part focuses on the applicability of international law to cyber operations. The second part identifies challenges that affect the applicability and application of international law in general, while the third part analyses challenges that affect specific norms of international law, highlighting their limits in dealing with cyber threats.

Adapting to Cybersecurity Challenges: Assessing the Effectiveness of International Law Against Cyber Terrorism

“…At first, cyber strikes were executed by people or tiny teams with restricted sources and technological competence. These lawful voids and uncertainties highlight the requirement for recurring initiatives to upgrade and enhance global lawful structures to equal the developing nature of cyber dangers (Delerue, 2019). Attending to these difficulties in using worldwide regulation to cyber terrorism is important for guaranteeing a reliable and detailed action to this developing hazard.…”

Careful What You Wish For

“…The idea of aligning the legal interpretation of like-minded States can grow incrementally both in areas of law and in number of States. 165 Resilience can be defined as the capacity to recover or adapt.166 This ability is facilitated by redundancy: if one avenue is cut off, another should remain open. If a State is unable or to invoke a breach of sovereignty due to the uncertainty surrounding this notion, other justifications for responses can be found in the force majeure and distress, but particularly in a plea of necessity.167 Necessity should not be invoked lightly and will only preclude wrongfulness if invoked to protect a State's essential "interest against a grave and imminent peril" without violating the rules or interests of other States.…”

Social Public Opinion Communication and Network Legal Management Based on Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Wireless Network

“…e high selectivity of online public opinion dissemination reflects not only the huge amount of information disseminated by online public opinion, but also its interactivity, immediacy, and independent dissemination. From the perspective of individual netizens, the simple acts of paying attention, clicking, posting news, and forwarding comments have little impact on the effect of spreading online public opinion, but the participation and discussion of a large number of netizens can form a complex information chain, time chain, and development chain, synchronizing with the development of the event itself, which is synchronized with the development of the event itself [21]. 3.…”