2014
DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcing Spirals Model: Conceptualizing the Relationship Between Media Content Exposure and the Development and Maintenance of Attitudes

Abstract: The Reinforcing Spirals Model (RSM, Citation Withheld) has two primary purposes. First, the RSM provides a general framework for conceptualizing media use as part of a dynamic, endogenous process combining selective exposure and media effects that may be drawn on by theorists concerned with a variety of social processes and effects. Second, the RSM utilizes a systems-theory perspective to describe how patterns of mediated and interpersonal communication contribute to the development and maintenance of social i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
183
1
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
183
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…aggressive behavior has been put forward in several theoretical models (e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Bandura, 2001;Cultivation Theory, Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1980; Reinforcing Spirals Model, Slater, 2014; the Differential Susceptibility to Media-effects Model, Valkenburg & Peter, 2013a). In these theories, the concepts of "resonance" (Gerbner et al, 1980) and "context-content convergence" (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013a) predict that stronger media effects may occur among those media users for whom media messages are congruent with their real life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aggressive behavior has been put forward in several theoretical models (e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Bandura, 2001;Cultivation Theory, Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1980; Reinforcing Spirals Model, Slater, 2014; the Differential Susceptibility to Media-effects Model, Valkenburg & Peter, 2013a). In these theories, the concepts of "resonance" (Gerbner et al, 1980) and "context-content convergence" (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013a) predict that stronger media effects may occur among those media users for whom media messages are congruent with their real life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum of three consecutive measurements per person is necessary to establish the complete process as proposed in Slater's (2007Slater's ( , 2015Slater's ( , 2017 conceptual work. The data is most commonly analyzed with cross-lagged panel models (CLPM; see, e.g., Figure 1 in Slater, 2007) or variants of parallel latent growth-curve models (PLGCM; e.g., Moeller & de Vreese, 2015;Schemer, 2012;Slater & Hayes, 2010).…”
Section: Preconditions Of (Statistical) Reinforcing Spirals Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reinforcing spirals model (RSM, Slater, 2007, 2015 has become a popular way of thinking about such reciprocal dynamics of media use and effects: Higher exposure to certain media messages leads to attitude change, which in turn leads to selective media use and higher exposure to similar messages, which in turn reinforces the attitude change, and so on. Moeller and de Vreese (2015), for example, investigated whether learning from the news and political news use reinforce each other over time in a sample of Dutch adolescents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, media exposure varies strongly across occasions, it might be more useful to look at situational factors rather than interpersonal differences or structural effects in order to understand media use and effects. The stability of media exposure is an important boundary condition for many contemporary theories of media effects, most notably the Reinforcing Spirals model (Slater, 2007(Slater, , 2015.Summarizing these arguments, Lee et al (2008) argue that understanding the reliability and the temporal stability of media exposure is essential to communication research. However, only very few studies have investigated this issue: Allen and Taylor (1985) compared the reliability and stability of exposure to different types of newspaper and television content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%