2021
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00418.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforcing rigor and reproducibility expectations for use of sex and gender in cardiovascular research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of both sexes is vital to a full understanding of the roles of NO, Hb, Hct, and viscosity in CBF regulation and for physiological research generally. 81 Thus the results of the current study cannot be extrapolated to females and future research is needed to address this limitation. 81 Abundant opportunities are available for future research regarding this matter to assess possible sex-related differences, the influence of androgens and estrogens, across the female menstrual cycle, pre versus post menopause, and pre versus post puberty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Inclusion of both sexes is vital to a full understanding of the roles of NO, Hb, Hct, and viscosity in CBF regulation and for physiological research generally. 81 Thus the results of the current study cannot be extrapolated to females and future research is needed to address this limitation. 81 Abundant opportunities are available for future research regarding this matter to assess possible sex-related differences, the influence of androgens and estrogens, across the female menstrual cycle, pre versus post menopause, and pre versus post puberty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, oestrogen may increase NO-related signalling (Hisamoto et al 2001;Florian et al 2004) and this could impact the contribution of NO to CVR at different stages of the menstrual cycle in females. Thus, the results of the current study cannot be extrapolated to females and future research is needed to address this limitation (Lindsey et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the results of the current study cannot be extrapolated to females and future research is needed to address this limitation (Lindsey et al . 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, women were not studied because it was not possible to adequately control for menstrual phase or attain the sample size requirements needed to account for sex‐based differences during this window of experimentation. However, we strongly advocate full representation in future experimental designs (Lindsey et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%