Recent work demonstrated an influence of ventilation on cerebrovascular reactivity to CO 2 ; however, the concomitant influence of changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) on ventilation-induced differences in cerebral blood flow (CBF) has yet to be examined in this context.Healthy participants (n = 15; 25 ± 3 years of age; 179 ± 6 cm height; 74 ± 10 kg weight; 3 female) underwent end-tidal forcing to increase their partial pressure of end-tidal CO 2 by +3, +6 and +9 mmHg above baseline in 5-min sequential steps while maintaining iso-oxia. This protocol was then repeated twice, with participants hyperventilating and hypoventilating by ∼30% compared to the first trial. Intra-cranial and extra-cranial CBF were measured using ultrasound. The MAP (finger photo-plethysmography) was higher during the hyperventilation and hypoventilation trials compared to normal ventilation (main effects, P < 0.05 for both). While internal carotid artery blood flow was higher during the hyperventilation trial compared to normal ventilation (P = 0.01), this was due to a higher MAP, as indicated by analysis of conductance values (P = 0.68) or inclusion of MAP in covariate analysis (P = 0.11). Global CBF (P = 0.11) and vertebral artery blood flow (P = 0.93) were unaffected by the magnitude of ventilation. Further, CO 2 reactivity was not affected by the different breathing trials (P > 0.05 for all). Retrospective analysis of a larger data set (n = 53) confirmed these observations and demonstrated no relationships between the ventilatory and global CBF response to hypercapnia (r 2 = 0.04; P = 0.14). Therefore, when differences in MAP are accounted for, cerebrovascular CO 2 reactivity (assessed via end-tidal forcing) is independent of the magnitude of ventilation.
Brachial artery (BA) shear-mediated dilatation is a widely used assessment of vascular function with links to coronary artery health and cardiovascular risk. r Cerebral vascular health is often interrogated using cerebrovascular (middle cerebral artery velocity) reactivity to carbon dioxide. r We show that endothelium-dependent diameter (dilator) responses are not significantly related between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and BA; nor are endothelium-independent responses. r Additionally, ICA endothelium-dependent responses are not related to middle cerebral artery velocity or ICA blood flow reactivity responses to carbon dioxide. r Therefore, assessment of large extracranial cerebral artery vascular health should be quantified via methods specific to the vessel, not via peripheral endothelial function or cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide.
Cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity (CVR) is often considered a bioassay of cerebrovascular endothelial function. We recently introduced a test of cerebral shear‐mediated dilatation (cSMD) that may better reflect endothelial function. We aimed to determine the nitric oxide (NO)‐dependency of CVR and cSMD. Eleven volunteers underwent a steady‐state CVR test and transient CO2 test of cSMD during intravenous infusion of the NO synthase inhibitor NG‐monomethyl‐l‐arginine (l‐NMMA) or volume‐matched saline (placebo; single‐blinded and counter‐balanced). We measured cerebral blood flow (CBF; duplex ultrasound), intra‐arterial blood pressure and PaCnormalO2${P_{{\rm{aC}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$. Paired arterial and jugular venous blood sampling allowed for the determination of trans‐cerebral NO2− exchange (ozone‐based chemiluminescence). l‐NMMA reduced arterial NO2− by ∼25% versus saline (74.3 ± 39.9 vs. 98.1 ± 34.2 nM; P = 0.03). The steady‐state CVR (20.1 ± 11.6 nM/min at baseline vs. 3.2 ± 16.7 nM/min at +9 mmHg PaCnormalO2${P_{{\rm{aC}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}$; P = 0.017) and transient cSMD tests (3.4 ± 5.9 nM/min at baseline vs. −1.8 ± 8.2 nM/min at 120 s post‐CO2; P = 0.044) shifted trans‐cerebral NO2− exchange towards a greater net release (a negative value indicates release). Although this trans‐cerebral NO2− release was abolished by l‐NMMA, CVR did not differ between the saline and l‐NMMA trials (57.2 ± 14.6 vs. 54.1 ± 12.1 ml/min/mmHg; P = 0.49), nor did l‐NMMA impact peak internal carotid artery dilatation during the steady‐state CVR test (6.2 ± 4.5 vs. 6.2 ± 5.0% dilatation; P = 0.960). However, l‐NMMA reduced cSMD by ∼37% compared to saline (2.91 ± 1.38 vs. 4.65 ± 2.50%; P = 0.009). Our findings indicate that NO is not an obligatory regulator of steady‐state CVR. Further, our novel transient CO2 test of cSMD is largely NO‐dependent and provides an in vivo bioassay of NO‐mediated cerebrovascular function in humans. Key points Emerging evidence indicates that a transient CO2 stimulus elicits shear‐mediated dilatation of the internal carotid artery, termed cerebral shear‐mediated dilatation. Whether or not cerebrovascular reactivity to a steady‐state CO2 stimulus is NO‐dependent remains unclear in humans. During both a steady‐state cerebrovascular reactivity test and a transient CO2 test of cerebral shear‐mediated dilatation, trans‐cerebral nitrite exchange shifted towards a net release indicating cerebrovascular NO production; this response was not evident following intravenous infusion of the non‐selective NO synthase inhibitor NG‐monomethyl‐l‐arginine. NO synthase blockade did not alter cerebrovascular reactivity in the steady‐state CO2 test; however, cerebral shear‐mediated dilatation following a transient CO2 stimulus was reduced by ∼37% following intravenous infusion of NG‐monomethyl‐l‐arginine. NO is not obligatory for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2, but is a key contributor to cerebral shear‐mediated dilatation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.