1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90567-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinforced porcelain system: A new concept in ceramometal restorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[35][36][37][38] These modified designs were never tested clinically, perhaps due to the general anecdotal awareness that MC restorations success rates are high. Indeed, our results showed the highest fatigue values for MC crowns, but no differences between standard versus modified designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] These modified designs were never tested clinically, perhaps due to the general anecdotal awareness that MC restorations success rates are high. Indeed, our results showed the highest fatigue values for MC crowns, but no differences between standard versus modified designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering parameters and their relationship to clinical longevity deserve further investigation 10 . For instance, in an attempt to improve clinical performance of all‐ceramic layered structures, core designs reinforcing the centric holding cusps have been attempted and are based on empirical metal ceramic restoration (MCR) work from the 1980s 11–14 . These anecdotal and empirical substructure design modifications have not been appropriately tested in controlled settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 For instance, in an attempt to improve clinical performance of all-ceramic layered structures, core designs reinforcing the centric holding cusps have been attempted and are based on empirical metal ceramic restoration (MCR) work from the 1980s. [11][12][13][14] These anecdotal and empirical substructure design modifications have not been appropriately tested in controlled settings. Similarly, attempts to improve FPD 6,8 longevity have not been verified in the laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the design of the core has been a heuristic process proposed for metal ceramic crowns (38–41) that has never been evaluated in clinical controlled trials, perhaps because the survival rates are known to be high in such systems (42). Porcelain veneered zirconia failures have led to concerns regarding adequate porcelain support (22), differences in the CTE between the core and the veneering porcelain and their respective processing techniques (4), the unknown clinical implications of tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation observed at the Y‐TZP/veneer interface (43), or the low thermal diffusivity of zirconia compared with alumina or metal (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%