2020
DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v9.i5.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reinfection risk of novel coronavirus (CoVID-19): A systematic ‎review of current evidence

Abstract: BACKGROUND There is recently a concern regarding the reinfection and reactivation of previously reCoVered coronavirus disease 2019 (CoVID-19) patients. AIM To summarize the recent findings and reports of CoVID-19 reinfection in patients previously reCoVered from the disease. METHODS This study was a systematic review of current evidence conducted in August 2020. The authors studied the probable reinfection risk of novel coronavirus (CoVID-19)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
124
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
124
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19, was first reported in China in late 2019 and then spread out rapidly worldwide [ 35 ]. COVID-19 attracted worldwide attention as an international public health emergency and the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19, was first reported in China in late 2019 and then spread out rapidly worldwide [ 35 ]. COVID-19 attracted worldwide attention as an international public health emergency and the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOC B.1.351 shows significant reduction of neutralizing titers in human convalescent serum [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The degree of protective immunity by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans is currently unknown, but several reports suggest that reinfection does occasionally occur [31][32][33]. In the Syrian hamster model, homologous challenge resulted in reduced virus shedding and reduced replication in the lungs [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific evidence on this subject is scarce, and most of the published studies are non-clinical. A systematic review, which included 35 clinical and non-clinical studies, suggests that humoral immunity (if non-persistent) and errors in the diagnosis of the disease should be considered when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (SeyedAlinaghi et al, 2020[ 32 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%