“…may look vastly different than a survivor-centered website where the focus is the victim or survivor and centering their needs and resources (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2020; University of Oregon, n.d.). Unfortunately, research has shown that institutions of higher education often use a compliance framework (Harris et al, 2020;Linder & Myers, 2018;Moylan & Javorka, 2020).…”
Section: Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Discourse In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on SV and IPV discourse within higher education is limited, with specific discourse analysis focused more prominently on policy, and research on the language of SV and IPV (inside and outside of higher education) focused on the use of specific language or terminology (Klein, 2013a), definitions (Kilpatrick, 2004), content of institutional websites and/or campus materials (Schwartz et al, 2015;Simmons & Clay, 2019), opposed to discourse analysis which is interested in the understanding the relationship of the communications and society at large. Additionally, large swaths of research on SV and IPV in higher education are quantitative (Coulter & Rankin, 2020;Thompson et al, 2015;Zapp et al, 2018) and/or are large systematic reviews (Fedina et al, 2018;Halstead et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2020;Krause, et al, 2019). Below is a summary of several pieces of existing literature in policy, media, and content analysis of sexual assault and/or intimate partner violence within higher education.…”
Section: Campus Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this research attends to the recommendations by Harris et al (2020) to engage in macro-level institutional research to better understand campus contexts. By analyzing discourse on institutional websites, we are able to look at an institution as a whole instead of individual department or program discourse.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is essential to understand that sexual and intimate partner violence is not merely an issue that happens on an individual level but is systemic. Unfortunately, much of the existing literature on campus interpersonal violence, and especially on sexual violence, maintains a focus on individuals and is devoid from examinations of power (Harris et al, 2020;Linder et al, 2020).…”
Section: Power Intersectionality and Campus Sexual Violence And Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the literature shows, higher education does not have universal language or universal responses to campus sexual violence and intimate partner violence (Fedina et al, 2018;Halstead et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2020;Karjane et al, 2002;Krause, et al, 2019;Linder et al, 2020;Musselman et al, 2020;Sabina et al, 2017). This research aligns with those findings, recognizing the different discourses presented at Baylor University and the University of Utah.…”
Section: Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Discoursesmentioning
The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred.
“…may look vastly different than a survivor-centered website where the focus is the victim or survivor and centering their needs and resources (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2020; University of Oregon, n.d.). Unfortunately, research has shown that institutions of higher education often use a compliance framework (Harris et al, 2020;Linder & Myers, 2018;Moylan & Javorka, 2020).…”
Section: Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Discourse In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on SV and IPV discourse within higher education is limited, with specific discourse analysis focused more prominently on policy, and research on the language of SV and IPV (inside and outside of higher education) focused on the use of specific language or terminology (Klein, 2013a), definitions (Kilpatrick, 2004), content of institutional websites and/or campus materials (Schwartz et al, 2015;Simmons & Clay, 2019), opposed to discourse analysis which is interested in the understanding the relationship of the communications and society at large. Additionally, large swaths of research on SV and IPV in higher education are quantitative (Coulter & Rankin, 2020;Thompson et al, 2015;Zapp et al, 2018) and/or are large systematic reviews (Fedina et al, 2018;Halstead et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2020;Krause, et al, 2019). Below is a summary of several pieces of existing literature in policy, media, and content analysis of sexual assault and/or intimate partner violence within higher education.…”
Section: Campus Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this research attends to the recommendations by Harris et al (2020) to engage in macro-level institutional research to better understand campus contexts. By analyzing discourse on institutional websites, we are able to look at an institution as a whole instead of individual department or program discourse.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is essential to understand that sexual and intimate partner violence is not merely an issue that happens on an individual level but is systemic. Unfortunately, much of the existing literature on campus interpersonal violence, and especially on sexual violence, maintains a focus on individuals and is devoid from examinations of power (Harris et al, 2020;Linder et al, 2020).…”
Section: Power Intersectionality and Campus Sexual Violence And Intimate Partner Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the literature shows, higher education does not have universal language or universal responses to campus sexual violence and intimate partner violence (Fedina et al, 2018;Halstead et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2020;Karjane et al, 2002;Krause, et al, 2019;Linder et al, 2020;Musselman et al, 2020;Sabina et al, 2017). This research aligns with those findings, recognizing the different discourses presented at Baylor University and the University of Utah.…”
Section: Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Discoursesmentioning
The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.