2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-022-00458-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Envisioning Bystander Programs for Campus Sexual Violence Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Programme creators should push beyond inclusion alone and explicitly integrate anti-oppression training and education about the unique risks for SOGD people and how stigmatizing homophobic, bi-phobic, queer-phobic, ace-phobic, and transphobic attitudes might foster individual-attitudes and broader climates that condones sexual violence towards the SOGD community (group-specific and relationship-level vulnerability factors). Scholars have made calls for preventionists and programme developers to centre marginalized voices and broader social justice efforts into programming (Bonomi, 2019 ; Brush & Miller, 2022 ; Klein et al, 2021 ; Rothman, 2019 ), in response to research demonstrating that SOGD communities tend to understand their increased risk for victimization as being attributed broader queerphobic/bi-phobic/homophobic/transphobic climate, want sexual prevention efforts to integrate social justice training into their programming (Flanders et al, 2023 ; Johnson et al, 2019 ; McMahon et al, 2020 ; Potter et al, 2012 ). Scholars have noted how gender transformative paradigms in prevention programmes (which aim to levy social norms approaches to challenge gender inequity that contributes to violence risk) (Brush & Miller, 2019 ; Orchowski, 2019 ) may be particularly helpful in considering strategies to change attitudes and perceptions of SOGD youth as deviant or dangerous, and promote attitudes that disavow violence against SOGD people (Miller, 2022 ).…”
Section: Recommendations For Enhancing Sogd Sexual Violence Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programme creators should push beyond inclusion alone and explicitly integrate anti-oppression training and education about the unique risks for SOGD people and how stigmatizing homophobic, bi-phobic, queer-phobic, ace-phobic, and transphobic attitudes might foster individual-attitudes and broader climates that condones sexual violence towards the SOGD community (group-specific and relationship-level vulnerability factors). Scholars have made calls for preventionists and programme developers to centre marginalized voices and broader social justice efforts into programming (Bonomi, 2019 ; Brush & Miller, 2022 ; Klein et al, 2021 ; Rothman, 2019 ), in response to research demonstrating that SOGD communities tend to understand their increased risk for victimization as being attributed broader queerphobic/bi-phobic/homophobic/transphobic climate, want sexual prevention efforts to integrate social justice training into their programming (Flanders et al, 2023 ; Johnson et al, 2019 ; McMahon et al, 2020 ; Potter et al, 2012 ). Scholars have noted how gender transformative paradigms in prevention programmes (which aim to levy social norms approaches to challenge gender inequity that contributes to violence risk) (Brush & Miller, 2019 ; Orchowski, 2019 ) may be particularly helpful in considering strategies to change attitudes and perceptions of SOGD youth as deviant or dangerous, and promote attitudes that disavow violence against SOGD people (Miller, 2022 ).…”
Section: Recommendations For Enhancing Sogd Sexual Violence Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%