Réification et reconnaissance. Une discussion avec Axel Honneth

Lazzeri, Christian

doi:10.3917/rdm.038.0259

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite the merits of Honneth's endeavor, his account of reification came in for criticism on various fronts and with different aims. See for example Deranty (2009, 460-465), Lazzeri (2011), Strydom (2012), andJütten (2010). For further explanations of Honenth's concept of reification and response to some criticisms, see Honneth (2008b).…”

Section: The Importance Of the Non-human Environment In The Formation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Axel Honneth, Reification, and "Nature"

Angella¹

2019

Radical Philosophy Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Importance Of the Non-human Environment In The Formation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Axel Honneth, Reification, and "Nature"

Angella¹

2019

Radical Philosophy Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Without this emotional recognition, we contemplate our mental states only as facts without value, or we produce states conforming to an external demand, which amounts to producing them in a purely instrumental way ” [ 16 ]. Thus, animal caretakers may experience reification at two different levels: from the researchers and from themselves, which may affect a lack of meaning in their work [ 17 ]. The reification of animals is also related to the reification of their caretakers: “ Animal research… not only reifies animals but also the human persons involved in this process ” [ 18 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Varying Degrees of Animal Reification by Stakeholders in Experimental Research

Cabaret

Fortin

2022

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The attitude towards animals in research depends on both the role of the stakeholder and their personal characteristics. Most studies on the subject have been carried out on stakeholders from biomedical research institutes with comparatively few sociological studies on stakeholders from agricultural research centers. Previous findings suggest that animal caretakers at agricultural research centers felt undervalued by the hierarchy, and that animal reification was present in the sector. This may indicate that a lack of consideration for the animal subjects correlates with an inadequate sensitivity towards humans. Since these findings were published twenty years ago, there has been an increasing emphasis on the importance and actions of ethics committees in research, animal welfare bodies, and public concern for animals, which may have impacted the current perspective. To better understand current degrees of animal reification amongst stakeholders of agricultural research, we conducted semi-directive interviews at a leading agricultural research institute in France (INRAE). The interviews targeted both animal caretakers and researchers who were involved in the study of infectious diseases in livestock, or the behavior of horses and quails. After having transcribed the recorded interviews into text, semi-automatized analyses were carried out to categorize them into distinct groups, from which the most characteristic words and sentences were extracted. Three groups of stakeholders were identified: (i) animal caretakers involved in invasive infectious disease research; (ii) animal caretakers involved in behavioral research; and (iii) researchers. The findings show that animal caretakers felt acknowledged by their hierarchy. It is possible the increased skill criteria for people recruited into this position over the years, combined with greater prospects for continuous learning and development in the profession, may have fostered a more respectful regard across the hierarchy. The animal caretakers clearly expressed that their primary objective was to successfully execute the research protocols and that the animals were viewed as prototypes for research, with which they could, on occasion, develop a bond with. The bond was more important for animal caretakers involved in behavioral studies than for those involved in the study of infectious diseases, where invasive biological sampling and restraining of the animals is required. Researchers prioritized the procurement of robust data to test hypotheses, analyze phenomena, and publish their results. Their concern for the animals rather reflected the views of the general public opposed to thought-out personal opinions on the matter; this is possibly due to their comparatively limited interaction with the animals. They considered the animals in abstract terms that were indicative of reification. This study concludes that animal reification is still present, albeit to varying degrees amongst the stakeholders.

show abstract

The Doctor-Patient Relationship in Telemedicine: The State of Play 25 Years On. From a Dermatology Perspective. (Preprint)

Démoulins,

Trupia,

Martin

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND In 1999, the inaugural editorial of JMIR underscored the imperative to evaluate the doctor-patient relationship amid the advent of Internet-driven medical practices. Even at that nascent stage, views diverged sharply. Some anticipated that novel communication technologies would enhance the closeness between doctors and patients. Others feared these technologies signaled a degradation of interpersonal connections and a dehumanization of healthcare experiences. Reflecting on years of developments, it's opportune to reassess the transformations in doctor-patient interactions. in which notions of distance and proximity are redefined in some unexpected ways OBJECTIVE In the present article, we intend to focus on teleconsultation and tele-expertise, the two most commonly used services in our field of dermatology. METHODS To navigate these changes, a sociological perspective inspired by Isaac Joseph's theoretical framework has been adopted. Joseph posits that service-oriented relationships depend on three core skill sets among participants: technical, civic, and contract management skills. In medicine, these translate to the clinical, social, and contractual aspects of care. Telemedicine programs introduce significant shifts and adaptations across these dimensions. RESULTS A primary challenge in telemedicine is the absence of comprehensive sensory information, a crucial component of traditional medical assessments. This article discusses how such technical alterations impact medical practice and necessitate a redistribution of roles. Telemedicine isn't merely about adapting existing technical skills; it also demands new competencies, often referred to as "invisible work," to make telemedicine work. Beyond its clinical dimensions, the therapeutic relationship is inherently social. It involves sending signals that confer respect and recognition of the other as a "person." A common concern is that telemedicine might objectify patients, although extensive literature suggests that physicians develop various strategies to mitigate these perceived constraints and risks. Conversely, other studies indicate an increased risk of reification—the treatment of people as objects—in constrained contexts. Contract management skills consist of the parties involved reaching an agreement on the purpose of the service-related relationship and its practical applications. In telemedicine, this may involve reminding the patient that not everything can be done remotely. CONCLUSIONS To conclude, the issue of dehumanization in the doctor-patient relationship has been a concern in telemedicine for the past 25 years. And yet, this is an inherent risk in any medical healthcare partnership regardless of whether patient care is delivered face-to-face or at a distance. While some studies have clearly documented the dehumanizing tendency of some telemedicine practices, telemedicine itself alone is neither reifying nor dehumanizing. The organizational arrangements, the context of work activities, the modalities of use in situ and the types of technological devices used are all contributing factors in defining the level of humanization in remote healthcare interactions.

show abstract

Réification et reconnaissance. Une discussion avec Axel Honneth

Cited by 9 publications

References 15 publications

Axel Honneth, Reification, and "Nature"

Axel Honneth, Reification, and "Nature"

Varying Degrees of Animal Reification by Stakeholders in Experimental Research

The Doctor-Patient Relationship in Telemedicine: The State of Play 25 Years On. From a Dermatology Perspective. (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About