Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Pieri, Francesco; Caselli, Ernesto; Forlivesi, Caterina; Corinaldesi, Giuseppe

doi:10.11607/jomi.4370

Cited by 16 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the selection of a short implant or sinus augmentation procedure in the atrophic posterior maxilla was still controversial. Pieri et al conceived that patients who received sinus augmentation surgery or short and diameter‐reduced implants in the posterior maxilla had no significant difference than others in terms of failure risk . However, some authors considered that implants shorter than 8 mm should be used with caution because they had a greater risk for failure .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pieri et al conceived that patients who received sinus augmentation surgery or short and diameter-reduced implants in the posterior maxilla had no significant difference than others in terms of failure risk. 9 However, some authors considered that implants shorter than 8 mm should be used with caution because they had a greater risk for failure. 10 Generally, no determinate relationships between potential risk factors and implant loss have been established.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals

Zhou

Dong

Zhu

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The knowledge of the potential risk factors associated with implant loss is crucial for dental clinicians, but the opinions about the risk factors are still diverse and controversial. Purpose This retrospective study assessed the risk factors associated with implant loss, especially that in the maxillary molar location. Materials and Methods From January 2015 to March 2017, 4338 Chinese patients received 6977 implants at Nanjing Stomatological Hospital. Information on patient age, gender, bone grafting procedure, implant location, length and diameter, and the records of lost implants were obtained. The Kaplan‐Meier method and log‐rank test were used to conduct a survival function analysis. Chi‐square test and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify risk factors related to implant loss. Results The cumulative survival rate (CSR) after 0‐32 months of observation period for all implants was 97.76%, and the CSR for maxillary molar implants was 97.00%. Maxillary molar implants showed a significantly lower CSR than the other implants (P < .05). Male sex, short implants (<10 mm) were considered as risk factors for implant loss. However, male sex and bone grafting procedure were regarded as risk factors for maxillary molar implant loss, which was slightly different from the result of all implants. Conclusions Male sex, short implants (<10 mm) and maxillary molar location were considered as potential risk factors for implant loss, whereas male sex and bone grafting procedure were significantly associated with implant loss in maxillary molar location.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals

Zhou

Dong

Zhu

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The patient can choose to have a dental bridge restoration to replace a single missing tooth or two missing teeth. Moreover, patients missing all premolars and molars or do not have back teeth to support the bridge restoration might prefer a partial removable denture than maxillary sinus augmentation surgery [17].…”

Section: Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Dental Implants

Göçmen¹,

Özkan²

2017

Paranasal Sinuses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus secondary to posterior maxillary tooth loss is an extremely common inding. Signiicant atrophy of the maxilla prevents dental implant placement in this region. Grafting the loor of the maxillary sinus has emerged as the most common surgical modality for correcting this inadequacy. Graft material is introduced into the space created inferior to the sinus membrane. Various grafting materials and techniques might be used in this procedure. The aim of this article is to review the essentials of maxillary sinus augmentation, clarify this procedure for otolaryngologists, explain its function, and describe the augmentation materials, techniques, and complications.

show abstract

“…Treatment plan was discussed with the patient, informed about potential complication for procedure choose. Patient was informed about alternative in prosthetic rehabilitation and an adeguate Informed Consent was taken [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”

Section: Programmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sinus Lift Procedure and Immediate Implant Placing: A Piezo-Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma Approach: A Case Report

Barbera¹,

Mat²,

Ahmed³

2017

Otolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals

Analysis of implant loss risk factors especially in maxillary molar location: A retrospective study of 6977 implants in Chinese individuals

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Dental Implants

Sinus Lift Procedure and Immediate Implant Placing: A Piezo-Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma Approach: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About