2018
DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2018.1434808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rehabilitation capital: a new form of capital to understand rehabilitation in a Nordic welfare state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How is the direct body-to-body interaction articulated in a field that promotes objective knowledge, evidence, standards, and biomedical thinking? Unfortunately, we expect that similarities in habitus constitute better treatment, as in the case of rehabilitation (Guldager et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How is the direct body-to-body interaction articulated in a field that promotes objective knowledge, evidence, standards, and biomedical thinking? Unfortunately, we expect that similarities in habitus constitute better treatment, as in the case of rehabilitation (Guldager et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes can produce inequality in healthcare. The focus on individual responsibility may seem liberating for relatives (and patients) who have the habitus and the capital to play this new game, while relatives who have not yet built sufficient schemata to act appropriately become 'difficult' relatives who do not succeed in collaborating with the healthcare professionals (Guldager, 2018(Guldager, , 2019. This seems to correlate with low social and economic capital, but inequality might also be produced in rehabilitation when relatives are not able to adjust to the mismatch between their expectations and the altered possibilities of the transformed healthcare field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it does add further nuance to a situation in which some relatives' expectations and their trust in the healthcare field may have been appropriate only a few years ago, Furthermore, the concept of hysteresis highlights how this mismatch in expectations occurs among relatives who only a few years ago saw themselves as having a favoured position in the welfare system because they had the right amount and components of capital according to the welfare state's rules and values. Now, however, their habitus does not provide the ability to recognise and adjust to the changed game (Bourdieu, Chamboredon, & Passeron, 1991), and a new hierarchy of resources which can be converted into capital in the rehabilitation field is emerging (Guldager et al, 2018). In this paper, we outline a theory concerning transformations that have taken place in the Danish welfare state which have meant that some relatives of patients in a stroke rehabilitation process sense that their dispositions are ill-adjusted to the objective opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to perceive need for care, particularly in case of common mental disorders which often lack a clear physical basis, and to cope with them by seeking healthcare or employing alternative strategies "not in the sense of a conscious plan, but as general styles and habits of action" (Shim, 2010, p. 3). Cultural health resources as the field-specific capital are semi-autonomous (although not entirely independent) from other capitals due to an ability to accumulate it through past experiences of health practices in the field (Guldager et al, 2018;Shim, 2010). Social capital, being linked to "membership in a group" (Bourdieu, 1997, p.51), also appears an effective resource encouraging (or impeding) help-seeking practices.…”
Section: On Capitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%