2020
DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory responses to medical machine learning

Abstract: Companies and healthcare providers are developing and implementing new applications of medical artificial intelligence, including the artificial intelligence sub-type of medical machine learning (MML). MML is based on the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms to automatically identify patterns and act on medical data to guide clinical decisions. MML poses challenges and raises important questions, including (1) How will regulators evaluate MML-based medical devices to ensure their safety and effectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The MDR also specifies the details of the classification of software. For example, "software intended to monitor physiological processes is classified as class IIa" only in cases where it is not "intended for monitoring of vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations of those parameters is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient" (Rule 11 in Chapter III of Annex VIII) 39,40 . also published guidelines for manufacturers that interpret the DiGAV and provide supplementary details on the procedure for inclusion in the register (SGB V, § 139e(8)) 12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MDR also specifies the details of the classification of software. For example, "software intended to monitor physiological processes is classified as class IIa" only in cases where it is not "intended for monitoring of vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations of those parameters is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient" (Rule 11 in Chapter III of Annex VIII) 39,40 . also published guidelines for manufacturers that interpret the DiGAV and provide supplementary details on the procedure for inclusion in the register (SGB V, § 139e(8)) 12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, DL models can handle high data complexity, yet are limited in demonstrating the reasoning behind their prediction. Particularly for health care utilization, it is crucial to build trust in these models and being able to understand their prediction, not at least for regulatory purposes 71 . Although considerable efforts have been made regarding explainable DL, the problem is still not solved at large 72 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Catastrophic forgetting,” where an algorithm abruptly deteriorates in its performance on the original task when a new task is learned, is a major barrier to the implementation of such continuous learning 76 . Nevertheless, the US Food and Drug Administration last year published a discussion paper outlining how such continuously adapting algorithms might be regulated in future clinical use 77,78 . Figure 3 outlines how neural networks could be embedded in either screening or specialist fetal cardiology workflows, with the potential inputs and outputs of such models.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%