2004
DOI: 10.1191/1740774504cn047oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory reforms and GCP clinical trials with new drugs in India

Abstract: Current Indian drug regulations do not allow for toxicology testing and clinical trials in India with compounds or molecules discovered abroad, except for treatments of tropical, cancer and cardiovascular diseases as part of global studies. The number of GCP Phase II/III trials by foreign sponsors has increased dramatically since 1995, attesting to the potential of India for lower cost trials and reduction in drug development costs and time, due to rapid patient recruitment. However, there have been problems w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiplicity and overlapping nature of the regulations (the three aforementioned guidelines) and sometimes ambiguous wording represent additional challenges [11,13,48]. This results in lengthy turnaround times for clinical trial approvals and under-enforcement of quality standards, which are features that have the potential to dissuade foreign sponsors from conducting clinical trials in India and may have contributed to the reduced number of clinical trials and departure of international collaborators [26,27,49].…”
Section: Regulatory Environment In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplicity and overlapping nature of the regulations (the three aforementioned guidelines) and sometimes ambiguous wording represent additional challenges [11,13,48]. This results in lengthy turnaround times for clinical trial approvals and under-enforcement of quality standards, which are features that have the potential to dissuade foreign sponsors from conducting clinical trials in India and may have contributed to the reduced number of clinical trials and departure of international collaborators [26,27,49].…”
Section: Regulatory Environment In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%