2001
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2001.1472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulatory Action Criteria for Filth and Other Extraneous Materials V. Strategy for Evaluating Hazardous and Nonhazardous Filth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such attributes include contacting potential sources of pathogens and endophilic, synanthropic, and communicative behaviors. Examples of pests exhibiting those attributes were published in the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "filth strategy" (66) and have become known as the "Dirty 22." Evidence of the presence of any of these pests in food, food processing areas, or food storage facilities is considered an indication of insanitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such attributes include contacting potential sources of pathogens and endophilic, synanthropic, and communicative behaviors. Examples of pests exhibiting those attributes were published in the revised U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "filth strategy" (66) and have become known as the "Dirty 22." Evidence of the presence of any of these pests in food, food processing areas, or food storage facilities is considered an indication of insanitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is amazing that few studies have been done on microscopic quality of foods, even though consumers complain of filth in foods (Olsen et al, 2001). This comprehensive article cited just 13 studies on this issue published since 1972.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is based on diagnostic cellular structures and morphological features of authentic ingredients (US Food & Drug Administration, 1998a). Few studies have been done on microscopic quality of foods (Olsen, Gecan, Ziobro, & Bryce, 2001), none of which in jams. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microscopic quality of guava (Psidium guajava), strawberry (Fragaria vesta) and grape (Vitis sp.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global production of FDA-regulated goods has exploded over the past decade, and the amount of imported material and ingredients used for production of finished products in U.S. manufacturing facilities has increased phenomenally. Consequently, for efficient regulation several strategies have been considered and developed, including the estimation of hazardous and nonhazardous filth and extraneous materials responsible for the adulteration of food products (2,(23)(24)(25)(26). The scientific basis for making a regulatory decision should also be considered when analyzing a food sample for common food pests that can contribute to the spread of foodbome pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish this difficult task, a series of reviews have been published to provide additional guidelines, which include a list of common food pest species (Table 1). These species are also called the " Dirty 22" species, and are deemed by the FDA to be a contributory factor for the spread of foodborne diseases (2,(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%