2015
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Stem Cell Fate by Nanomaterial Substrates

Abstract: Major design aspects for novel biomaterials are driven by the desire to mimic more varied and complex properties of a natural cellular environment with man-made materials. The development of stimulus responsive materials makes considerable contributions to the effort to incorporate dynamic and reversible elements into a biomaterial. This is particularly challenging for cell-material interactions that occur at an interface (biointerfaces); however, the design of responsive biointerfaces also presents opportunit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 320 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that surface topography and elasticity affect cell fate [26][27][28] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 chondrocytes imprinted substrates ( figure 5-a2). The same results were also previously reported for rabbit stem cells 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that surface topography and elasticity affect cell fate [26][27][28] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 chondrocytes imprinted substrates ( figure 5-a2). The same results were also previously reported for rabbit stem cells 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because adherent cells attach loosely to the uncharged polystyrene plate, its surface must be modified by plasma, for example. However, its rigidity is not ideal for stem cell growth, often inducing random and spontaneous differentiation (Mashinchian et al 2015). In our work, PCL nano-/microfibers had good physicomechanical properties compared to TCP, and this accounted for significant keratinocyte differentiation and higher proliferative activity of ASCs on the PCL matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the present study, it seemed that ASCs might have considerable impact on epithelialization, development of skin appendages and organization of the dermis and eventually accelerate wound healing compared to the application of PCL matrices devoid of ASCs after implantation. Mashinchian et al (2015) have introduced chemical, physicomechanical and topographical factors as a triangle of control of stem cell fate. Although chemical factors are potent regulators of cell behavior, their effects are limited because they are thought to be only one component of the 'triangle' of cell control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current micro and nanofabrication techniques can be implemented to generate 2D and 3D structures possessing the topography and surface features to support more physiologically relevant 3D stem cell cultures [103,104]. Among such fabrication techniques is electrospinning.…”
Section: D Substrates For Psc Culturementioning
confidence: 99%