2012
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2012.685236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Biopharming: The Prism of Farmer Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Riley ). This way of knowing is seen as ‘personal and context‐dependent, and as such (…) difficult if not impossible to communicate other than through personal interaction in a context of shared experiences ’ (Goven and Morris , p. 161, my emphasis). It is a form of knowledge that emphasises knowledge as practice as well as cognition (Morris , p. 79).…”
Section: Experiential Knowledge and Care: A Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Riley ). This way of knowing is seen as ‘personal and context‐dependent, and as such (…) difficult if not impossible to communicate other than through personal interaction in a context of shared experiences ’ (Goven and Morris , p. 161, my emphasis). It is a form of knowledge that emphasises knowledge as practice as well as cognition (Morris , p. 79).…”
Section: Experiential Knowledge and Care: A Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has contributed much to current understandings of farming knowledge, and shown that farmers value and use different kinds of knowledges, including 'those developed through practical experience of agriculture, and the management of its natures' (Morris 2006, p. 125). These knowledges are variously referred to in the agro-food context as tacit (Morgan and Murdoch 2000), local (Clark and Murdoch 1997;Raymond et al 2010), embodied (Carolan 2008), experiential (Goven and Morris 2012), or traditional (Berkes et al 2000).…”
Section: Farmers and Experiential Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike these studies of practical farming, our focus on farmers' assessments of new technology fall within a small group of studies which look at the knowledge farmers draw on when they engage in more general discussions of policies and the regulation of technology within agriculture. Only a few such studies exist, and they typically address farmers' knowledge either in relation to the assessment of the risks and regulation of genetic technologies (Mauro and McLachlan 2008;Mauro et al 2009;Goven and Morris 2012) or in relation to farmers' decisions to adopt a new technology in their own practice (Kaup 2008).…”
Section: Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few such studies exist, and they typically address farmers’ knowledge either in relation to the assessment of the risks and regulation of genetic technologies (Mauro and McLachlan ; Mauro et al . ; Goven and Morris ) or in relation to farmers’ decisions to adopt a new technology in their own practice (Kaup ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of knowledge is dynamic and includes complex bodies of know-how, practices and skills that are developed and sustained over time and generations by people and their communities on the base of their experiences in their specific environmental and socio-economic realities (Goven and Morris, 2012). Farmers in Camposeven consider the protection of this type of knowledge key for prosperity, as it results on the protection of the local culture and…”
Section: "Mutual Learning Process Helps Improve Our Knowledge and Thmentioning
confidence: 99%