SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005 2005
DOI: 10.1190/1.2148054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularized least‐squares inversion for 3‐D subsalt imaging

Abstract: SUMMARYObtaining seismic images of the subsurface near and beneath salt is very difficult due to seismic energy that is lost by propagating outside of the survey area or becoming evanescent at salt boundaries (poor illumination). We demonstrate an iterative regularized least-squares inversion for imaging that helps to compensate for illumination problems. We show the use of a regularization operator that acts to regularize amplitudes along reflection angles (or equivalent offset ray parameters) to compensate f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we would like to discuss the relationship between the resolving kernel derived in this paper and the Hessian matrix in least-square inversion because they are closely related to each other. In the leastsquare inversion (Beylkin, 1985;Chavent and Plessix, 1999;Clapp et al, 2005;Hu et al, 2001;Kuhl and Sacchi, 2003;Lailly, 1983;Plessix and Mulder, 2004;Pratt et al, 1998;Rickett, 2003;Tarantola, 1984a;ten Kroode et al, 1994;Valenciano et al, 2005Valenciano et al, , 2006, which is based on the minimizing the misfit function using adjoint operator in the Hessian matrix, the backpropagation operator is defined as the gradient of the least-square error function, and the Hessian matrix is the second derivative of the error function (Plessix and Mulder, 2004). There are several differences between the formula of the resolving kernel and that of Hessian matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we would like to discuss the relationship between the resolving kernel derived in this paper and the Hessian matrix in least-square inversion because they are closely related to each other. In the leastsquare inversion (Beylkin, 1985;Chavent and Plessix, 1999;Clapp et al, 2005;Hu et al, 2001;Kuhl and Sacchi, 2003;Lailly, 1983;Plessix and Mulder, 2004;Pratt et al, 1998;Rickett, 2003;Tarantola, 1984a;ten Kroode et al, 1994;Valenciano et al, 2005Valenciano et al, , 2006, which is based on the minimizing the misfit function using adjoint operator in the Hessian matrix, the backpropagation operator is defined as the gradient of the least-square error function, and the Hessian matrix is the second derivative of the error function (Plessix and Mulder, 2004). There are several differences between the formula of the resolving kernel and that of Hessian matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He rejected the idea that environmentalism needs to be redefined and rejected calls for the death of current environmentalism as nihilistic and counterproductive. Along similar lines, Phil Clapp (2005), head of the National Environmental Trust, argued that while environmentalists should regularly reassess their strategy, climate change is unfolding along the exact same trajectory that other major environmental statutes have followed over the past 30 years:…”
Section: G Brynermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[10] first proposed the concept of the least-squares migration (LSM), which afterward catches the wide attention from academia and industry. LSM is first applied to Kirchhoff migration [11], [12], and then phase-shift migration [13], [14] and one-way wave-equation migration [15], [16], and now RTM. Here, we mainly focus on LSRTM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%