1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00575396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularities of MgO single-crystal failure in microindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 GPa and E [1 0 0] ¼36.6 GPa [3], which correlates with anisotropy of microhardness. Recovery of the indentation is in inverse proportion to the Young's modulus [10]. This explains some asymmetry of the indentation shape (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 GPa and E [1 0 0] ¼36.6 GPa [3], which correlates with anisotropy of microhardness. Recovery of the indentation is in inverse proportion to the Young's modulus [10]. This explains some asymmetry of the indentation shape (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 shows dependences of microhardness on time under load for three discrete loads: 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 N. It is seen that the highest hardness appears in the case of the lowest load and the shortest time under load. This is caused by the fact that lifting of the load is accompanied by elastic recovery of the indentation and relaxation of stresses [10]. In the case of a small load when elastic strain is the main part of the deformation, the percentage of the indentation recovery after the uplifting of the indenter is greater than that in the case of a higher load when plastic strain is significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The microhardness anisotropy of I and I1 kinds (the dependence of hardness on the direction for one face and the dependence of hardness on the type of face) for alkali halide crystals such as NaCl has been studied (AERTS et al; BERKOVICH; BROOKES et al 1971; BOYARSKAYA; BOYARSKAYA et al 1978, 1979BROOKES et al 1975; NA-RASHIMA REDDY ; HARI BABU; BOYARSKAYA et al 1986), the influence of temperature (BOYARSKAYA; BOYARSKAYA et al 1978, 1986BROOKES et al 1975;BOYARSKAYA et al 1986) and radiation defects (BOYARSKAYA; BOYARSKAYA et al 1978) on this characteristic has been investigated. An interesting phenomenon was revealed by using the Knoop indentor -the change of the microhardness anisotropy sign in dependence on the temperature, indentation time and the microhardness change in the series of crystals, having the same lattice structure (BOYARSKAYA et al 1978, 1979BOYARSKAYA et al 1979;BROOKES et al 1975;ROYARSKAYA et al 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%