2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.107.024005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular evaporating black holes with stable cores

Abstract: We reply to the "Comment" on "Regular evaporating black holes with stable cores" by R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio, and M. Visser. As a key result, we show that the regime of mass-inflation identified in the comment connects smoothly to the late-time attractors discovered in our works [A. Bonanno et. al., Regular black holes with stable cores, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124027 (2021) and Regular evaporating black holes with stable cores, Phys. Rev. D 107, 024005 (2023)]. Hence, the late-time … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their importance lies in that (i) the cosmological constant, in non-unimodular settings, might re-introduce the curvature singularity-unless the dimensionless cosmological constant vanishes at high energies and critical exponents satisfy certain bounds [74,75], (ii) non-rotating black holes are unlikely configurations and, moreover, spin is decisive in establishing the shadow properties of black holes beyond general relativity [83][84][85], (iii) gravitational collapse renders singularity resolution less straightforward than in the static case, and it is likely that its endpoint be a black hole with an integrable singularity rather than a regular one [97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]. In particular, this scenario might be desirable as it naturally avoids the potential perturbative instabilities characterizing regular black holes [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their importance lies in that (i) the cosmological constant, in non-unimodular settings, might re-introduce the curvature singularity-unless the dimensionless cosmological constant vanishes at high energies and critical exponents satisfy certain bounds [74,75], (ii) non-rotating black holes are unlikely configurations and, moreover, spin is decisive in establishing the shadow properties of black holes beyond general relativity [83][84][85], (iii) gravitational collapse renders singularity resolution less straightforward than in the static case, and it is likely that its endpoint be a black hole with an integrable singularity rather than a regular one [97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105]. In particular, this scenario might be desirable as it naturally avoids the potential perturbative instabilities characterizing regular black holes [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiscreening of gravity at high energies can in principle limit the increase rate of the mass function, and could at least weaken the singularity classically formed at the Cauchy horizon [48]. However, the question of mass inflation and inner horizon (in)stability is still under heated debate [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. 5 Black hole temperature against the ADM mass m for classical (blu line) and RG-improved (green line) black holes.…”
Section: The Spherically-symmetric Asymptotically-flat Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exist several indications that this is the case. In particular, regular black-hole spacetimes have been found in superrenormalizable infinite-derivative quantum gravity [97,103], non-local gravity [72,95,[104][105][106], asymptotically safe quantum gravity [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]107] and recent studies explicitly taking into account infinite towers of highercurvature corrections [108]. These findings contrast black-hole solutions in perturbatively renormalizable models, such as quadratic gravity where spacetime singularities persist [51,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Regular black holes are usually understood as phenomenological models, but not yet as the ultimate and correct description of a fully consistent black-hole spacetime [118], due to the following reason: regular black holes contain inner horizons, which become Cauchy horizons if not disappearing in finite time due to evaporation or some other process. The spacetime region around inner horizons generically displays an exponential focusing of null rays unless the inner surface gravity vanishes [119,120], which results in an exponential mass inflation phase in which curvature invariants grow exponentially [121,122] (see also [123][124][125][126]). The endpoint of this dynamical evolution is unknown, and is a question to be addressed in specific dynamical frameworks leading to regular black hole solutions.…”
Section: Jcap05(2024)103mentioning
confidence: 99%