2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression systems for unbalanced panel data: a stepwise maximum likelihood procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, after all, the main objective of the study. For estimation purpose, we use seemingly unrelated regression method with random effects in the context of panel data as suggested by Biørn (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is, after all, the main objective of the study. For estimation purpose, we use seemingly unrelated regression method with random effects in the context of panel data as suggested by Biørn (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the econometric methods available for the estimation of a system of equations for unbalanced panel-data are relatively new. Biørn (2004) develops a procedure for the estimation of a one-way Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) system with random effects (RE). Monte Carlo simulations show that SUR techniques are superior as compared to the standard single equation FE and RE estimators.…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We further tested for heteroskedasticity using White's test (White 1980), and for autocorrelation using the Durbin-Watson test (Greene 2002), and did not find any problems. As there are multiple projects per PM, the SUR estimation for panel data uses random effects to correct for any potential correlation of residuals across projects that are nested within the PM (Greene 2002, Biørn 2004). In our SUR estimation, we added the dummy variable dVendorClient, indicating the vendor's prior client experience, to the client satisfaction equation, to render the parameters in the two equations different and identify the system of equations (Wooldridge 2002).…”
Section: Analysis Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%