Abstract:Abstract-Regolith is abundant on extra-terrestrial surfacesand is the source of many resources such as oxygen, hydrogen, titanium, aluminum, iron, silica and other valuable materials, which can be used to make rocket propellant, consumables for life support, radiation protection barrier shields, landing pads, blast protection berms, roads, habitats and other structures and devices. Recent data from the Moon also indicates that there are substantial deposits of water ice in permanently shadowed crater regions a… Show more
“…A common approach used to assess the efficacy of various methods of remote geological exploration and sampling is to study a terrestrial site that is analogous to the pertinent characteristics of the target extraterrestrial site, using rovers, communication systems, and other equipment similar to that used in remote exploration (Greeley et al, 1994;Whittaker et al, 1997;Arvidson et al, 2000;Stoker et al, 2001Stoker et al, , 2002Lee et al, 2007;Fong et al, 2010;Eppler et al, 2013;Graham et al, 2015;Lim et al, 2018;Osinski et al, 2019). Although this method has shown success when the goal is to test technology (e.g., Zacny et al, 2011;Mueller et al, 2013;Sanders and Larson, 2015), it has proven more difficult when testing the decision-making process of conducting science remotely. This difficulty stems from the dependence on the use of technology that, if not performing nominally, causes breaks in the science decision-making process that compromise test fidelity for science operations (Cohen, 2012;Eppler et al, 2013;Graham et al, 2015;Yingst et al, 2015).…”
We conducted a field test at a potential Mars analog site to provide insight into planning for future robotic missions such as Mars 2020, where science operations must facilitate efficient choice of biologically relevant sampling locations. We compared two data acquisition and decision-making protocols currently used by Mars Science Laboratory: (1) a linear approach, where sites are examined as they are encountered and (2) a walkabout approach, in which the field site is first examined with remote rover instruments to gain an understanding of regional context followed by deployment of time-and power-intensive contact and sampling instruments on a smaller subset of locations. The walkabout method was advantageous in terms of both the time required to execute and a greater confidence in results and interpretations, leading to enhanced ability to tailor follow-on observations to better address key science and sampling goals. This advantage is directly linked to the walkabout method's ability to provide broad geological context earlier in the science analysis process. For Mars 2020, and specifically for small regions to be explored (e.g., <1 km 2), we recommend that the walkabout approach be considered where possible, to provide early context and time for the science team to develop a coherent suite of hypotheses and robust ways to test them.
“…A common approach used to assess the efficacy of various methods of remote geological exploration and sampling is to study a terrestrial site that is analogous to the pertinent characteristics of the target extraterrestrial site, using rovers, communication systems, and other equipment similar to that used in remote exploration (Greeley et al, 1994;Whittaker et al, 1997;Arvidson et al, 2000;Stoker et al, 2001Stoker et al, , 2002Lee et al, 2007;Fong et al, 2010;Eppler et al, 2013;Graham et al, 2015;Lim et al, 2018;Osinski et al, 2019). Although this method has shown success when the goal is to test technology (e.g., Zacny et al, 2011;Mueller et al, 2013;Sanders and Larson, 2015), it has proven more difficult when testing the decision-making process of conducting science remotely. This difficulty stems from the dependence on the use of technology that, if not performing nominally, causes breaks in the science decision-making process that compromise test fidelity for science operations (Cohen, 2012;Eppler et al, 2013;Graham et al, 2015;Yingst et al, 2015).…”
We conducted a field test at a potential Mars analog site to provide insight into planning for future robotic missions such as Mars 2020, where science operations must facilitate efficient choice of biologically relevant sampling locations. We compared two data acquisition and decision-making protocols currently used by Mars Science Laboratory: (1) a linear approach, where sites are examined as they are encountered and (2) a walkabout approach, in which the field site is first examined with remote rover instruments to gain an understanding of regional context followed by deployment of time-and power-intensive contact and sampling instruments on a smaller subset of locations. The walkabout method was advantageous in terms of both the time required to execute and a greater confidence in results and interpretations, leading to enhanced ability to tailor follow-on observations to better address key science and sampling goals. This advantage is directly linked to the walkabout method's ability to provide broad geological context earlier in the science analysis process. For Mars 2020, and specifically for small regions to be explored (e.g., <1 km 2), we recommend that the walkabout approach be considered where possible, to provide early context and time for the science team to develop a coherent suite of hypotheses and robust ways to test them.
“…For the excavation subsystem, the RASSOR rover 5 was chosen. Currently in development at Kennedy Space Center, this is a small rover (~66 kg) that uses twin bucket drums to excavate ~80 kg of regolith.…”
In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) will enable the long term presence of humans beyond low earth orbit. Since 2009, oxygen production from the Mars atmosphere has been baselined as an enabling technology for Mars human exploration by NASA. However, using water from the Martian regolith in addition to the atmospheric CO2 would enable the production of both liquid Methane and liquid Oxygen, thus fully fueling a Mars return vehicle. A case study was performed to show how ISRU can support NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC) using methane and oxygen production from Mars resources. A model was built and used to generate mass and power estimates of an end-to-end ISRU system including excavation and extraction water from Mars regolith, processing the Mars atmosphere, and liquefying the propellants. Even using the lowest yield regolith, a full ISRU system would weigh 1.7 mT while eliminating the need to transport 30 mT of ascent propellants from earth.
“…A significant fraction of the space development community is working on technologies and business plans related to the cis-lunar water economy. NASA, with a view to buying propellant, is funding businesses and academia to develop the technologies [181][182][183]; they are also developing such technologies in-house [23,[184][185][186]. NASA's annual Robotic Mining Competition [187] offers incentive points for robots that dig deeper into the regolith, simulating the process of acquiring lunar or Martian water from beneath a desiccated overburden, thereby crowdsourcing the development of digging techniques.…”
Section: Building a Cis-lunar Water Economymentioning
The national space programs have an historic opportunity to help solve the global-scale economic and environmental problems of Earth while becoming more effective at science through the use of space resources. Space programs will be more cost-effective when they work to establish a supply chain in space, mining and manufacturing then replicating the assets of the supply chain so it grows to larger capacity. This has become achievable because of advances in robotics and artificial intelligence. It is roughly estimated that developing a lunar outpost that relies upon and also develops the supply chain will cost about 1/3 or less of the existing annual budgets of the national space programs. It will require a sustained commitment of several decades to complete, during which time science and exploration become increasingly effective. At the end, this space industry will capable of addressing global-scale challenges including limited resources, clean energy, economic development, and preservation of the environment. Other potential solutions, including nuclear fusion and terrestrial renewable energy sources, do not address the root problem of our limited globe and there are real questions whether they will be inadequate or too late. While industry in space likewise cannot provide perfect assurance, it is uniquely able to solve the root problem, and it gives us an important chance that we should grasp. What makes this such an historic opportunity is that the space-based solution is obtainable as a side-benefit of doing space science and exploration within their existing budgets. Thinking pragmatically, it may take some time for policymakers to agree that setting up a complete supply chain is an achievable goal, so this paper describes a strategy of incremental progress. The most crucial part of this strategy is establishing a water economy by mining on the Moon and asteroids to manufacture rocket propellant. Technologies that support a water economy will play an important role leading toward space development.Please cite this article in press as: P.T. Metzger, Space development and space science together, an historic opportunity, Space Policy (2016), http://dx.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.