2014
DOI: 10.12933/therya-14-252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registro de presencia y actividades de algunos mamíferos en el Desierto Chihuahuense, México

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the activity of the bobcat in the NCP is consistent with the activity that has been registered in populations from other ecosystems where they are extant: 30 % of the records correspond to daytime activity, and 70 % to twilight-night activity (Anderson and Lovallo 2003;Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Flores-Morales et al 2019;Serna-Lagunes et al 2019).…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In general, the activity of the bobcat in the NCP is consistent with the activity that has been registered in populations from other ecosystems where they are extant: 30 % of the records correspond to daytime activity, and 70 % to twilight-night activity (Anderson and Lovallo 2003;Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Flores-Morales et al 2019;Serna-Lagunes et al 2019).…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The Pico de Orizaba National Park (PONP) contains several nationally important ecosystems that are at risk of habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic disturbance despite having a protected status (SEMARNAT and CONABIO, 2015). The PONB is also thought to have a nationally important population of bobcat (Lynx rufus), and coyote (Canis latrans), but records from PONP are few (SEMARNAT and CONABIO, 2015) and information on coexistence strategies between both predators in Mexico (Hidalgo-Mihart et al, 2009;Elizalde-Arellano et al, 2014) is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the APs of L. rufus and C. latrans, and their main prey species in the PONP, including the temporal overlap between these co-predators and potential prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los tres géneros son capaces de trepar a los árboles, pero Spilogale es más ágil y hábil como escalador y puede explotar una gama diferente de recursos en comparación con Conepatus y Mephitis (Wade-Smith y Verts 1982; Kinlaw 1995;Reid 1997;Rosatte y Larivière 2003). No fue posible comparar los resultados de abundancia relativa y sus diferencias estacionales con información de otras poblaciones de mefítidos en México, ya que se limitan a documentar que C. leuconotus y M. macroura pueden estar en proximidad y alimentarse en cercanía física, y a reportar densidades poblacionales bajas (List y MacDonald 1998;Cervantes et al 2002;Monroy-Vilchis et al 2011;Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014). En México, el estado de conservación de las poblaciones de mefítidos simpátricos es incierto.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified