2019
DOI: 10.32800/abc.2019.42.0153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal overlap in the activity of Lynx rufus and Canis latrans and their potential prey in the Pico de Orizaba National Park, Mexico

Abstract: Temporal overlap in the activity of Lynx rufus and Canis latrans and their potential prey in the Pico de Orizaba National Park, Mexico. Species of the same trophic guild are thought to coexist through their differential use of resources, including food, space and time. Time understood as the pattern of activity is highly dynamic. Fourteen camera-traps were set up in the Pico de Orizaba National Park and active for 12 months. Frequency histograms were used to analyze their activity patterns (AP) and a coefficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the activity of the bobcat in the NCP is consistent with the activity that has been registered in populations from other ecosystems where they are extant: 30 % of the records correspond to daytime activity, and 70 % to twilight-night activity (Anderson and Lovallo 2003;Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Flores-Morales et al 2019;Serna-Lagunes et al 2019).…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In general, the activity of the bobcat in the NCP is consistent with the activity that has been registered in populations from other ecosystems where they are extant: 30 % of the records correspond to daytime activity, and 70 % to twilight-night activity (Anderson and Lovallo 2003;Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Flores-Morales et al 2019;Serna-Lagunes et al 2019).…”
Section: Sourcesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, studies using telemetry typically have significantly low sample sizes (number of individuals of both species tracked at the same time). With the advent of occupancy modelling (Mackenzie et al 2002, Tyre et al 2003), more recent studies ( n = 11; Table 1) used camera traps to assess spatial and temporal habitat use and occupancy by bobcats and coyotes (Fedriani et al 2000, Reed 2011, Lesmeister et al 2015, Bender et al 2017, Flores‐Morales et al 2018, Rich et al 2018, Parsons et al 2019, Serna‐Lagunes et al 2019, Lombardi et al 2020, Ochoa et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this period, we moved the same two cameras to another habitat unit, until complete coverage the four habitat units (Díaz-Pulido and Payán-Garrido, 2012). We achieved the photocaptures obtained from the gray and were classified as independent records (presences), when between photocaptures there was more than 24 hours difference, when two or more specimens were fully distinguishable in the same photocapture, or when two or more individuals were photocaptured on the same day, but that by external characteristics (brands) could be differentiated (Serna-Lagunes et al, 2019). During the same period that the photo traps remained active (December 2018-June 2019), 10 field trips with a duration of 2 days each and with an interval of 15 days between exits (phototramps were active in each habitat unit at the same time the field trips), with the aim of recording the presence of U. cinereoargenteus through the strip transect technique (Mandujano-Rodríguez, 2011).…”
Section: Determination Of the Presence Of Gray Fox In Habitat Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%