2002
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.2214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of ‘TCLF‐ AN‐31’ Triticale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample means were calculated both within and across locations. For multiple‐location data analysis, only 22 entries common in all locations and years were included in two cuttings, including TCLF‐AN‐105 and the reference cultivar, TCLF‐AN‐31 (Lozano del Río et al, 2002). Samplings and cultivars were considered as fixed effects, with locations and replications considered as random effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample means were calculated both within and across locations. For multiple‐location data analysis, only 22 entries common in all locations and years were included in two cuttings, including TCLF‐AN‐105 and the reference cultivar, TCLF‐AN‐31 (Lozano del Río et al, 2002). Samplings and cultivars were considered as fixed effects, with locations and replications considered as random effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSD test (α = 0.05) was used to determine the significance of mean differences among treatments for the traits evaluated. In all evaluations, the reference cultivar was ‘TCLF‐AN‐31’ triticale (Lozano del Río et al, 2002). Cuttings and cultivars were considered as fixed effects, with locations and replications considered as random effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%