2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007760170006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional specificity in degenerative changes in finger joints: an anatomical study using cadavers of the elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm the conclusions of Caspi at al. (2001) regarding DIP joints and disagree with those of Nakamura et al (2001). We also agree with Chaisson et al (1997) that the most frequently affected joints were quite similar in both sexes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results confirm the conclusions of Caspi at al. (2001) regarding DIP joints and disagree with those of Nakamura et al (2001). We also agree with Chaisson et al (1997) that the most frequently affected joints were quite similar in both sexes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Note, for instance, that Chaisson et al (1997) and Caspi et al (2001) reported that while the cumulative incidence of OA was generally higher in women than in men, the joints most frequently affected were the same in both sexes. Nakamura et al (2001) and Jonsson et al (1999) noted a female preponderance in CMC1 joint OA, but they found no clear differences between sexes in DIPs. Caspi et al (2001) showed that the dominant hand had significantly higher total OA scores as well as isolated joint scores, but other investigators (Lane et al, 1989;Jonsson et al, 1999;Nakamura et al, 2001) failed to reveal any prevalence of OA in the dominant hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The final point, the mirror-image progress, was not well investigated in previous studies except by Hirose et al (1999) and Nakamura et al (2001). In general, all DCs seemed to have been believed to occur in the mirror-image manner because in radiological observations of is hard to identify nonmirror image lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%