1989
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91400-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional neuroleptic microinjections indicate a role for nucleus accumbens in lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation reward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for dopamine's importance in ICS includes the reduced responding in rats with lesions of dopaminergic neurons (34), the blockade of ICS by NAc microinjections of a dopaminergic antagonist (16), and the impaired ICS in D1 knockout mice (12). However, measurements of dopamine release during ICS indicate that it is not a necessary condition for ICS (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for dopamine's importance in ICS includes the reduced responding in rats with lesions of dopaminergic neurons (34), the blockade of ICS by NAc microinjections of a dopaminergic antagonist (16), and the impaired ICS in D1 knockout mice (12). However, measurements of dopamine release during ICS indicate that it is not a necessary condition for ICS (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One set of axons that occupy the MFB are the ascending neurons of the mesolimbic dopamine system that project to the NAc from their origin in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (13,14). Because electrical stimulation with parameters that are used in ICS causes antidromic firing of dopaminergic neurons (15) and dopamine-receptor antagonists applied to the NAc inhibit ICS reinforcement (16), dopamine neurotransmission in the NAc is considered important in reward processing (17). Modern views of rewardrelated behavior ascribe an alerting or learning role to dopamine, rather than direct mediation of hedonia (2,14,18,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, there is a substantial body of evidence showing that release of DA in the nucleus accumbens plays a key role in reward. Blockade of DA receptors in this region reduces BSR (Stellar and Corbett, 1989;Nakajima and Patterson, 1997), whereas injection of amphetamine, a drug that increases local DA release, enhances reward (Colle and Wise, 1988;Ranaldi and Beninger, 1994). How can we explain the reduction effect of M100907 on the attenuation of haloperidol on reward?…”
Section: -Ht2a Receptors Blockade Reduces Reward Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACB DA depletion, produced by 6-OH DA, abolishes or attenuates intravenous self-administration of the indirect DA agonists amphetamine and cocaine (Roberts et al, 1977;Lyness et al, 1979;Pettit et al, 1984). Microinjection of DA antagonists into the ACB disrupts operant responding maintained by electrical brain stimulation (Mora et al, 1975;Mogenson et al, 1979;Stellar et al, 1983;Stellar and Corbett, 1989) and food (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1996). Amphetamine microinf used into the ACB facilitates brain electrical self-stimulation (Broekkamp et al, 1975;Colle and Wise, 1988) and produces place-preference conditioning (C arr andWhite, 1983, 1986).…”
Section: Abstract: Dopamine D 1 Receptor; Dopamine D 2 Receptor; Skfmentioning
confidence: 99%