2006
DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-5559-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional lightning NO<sub>x</sub> sources during the TROCCINOX experiment

Abstract: Abstract.A lightning NO x (LiNOx) source has been implemented in the deep convection scheme of the Meso-NH mesoscale model following a mass-flux formalism coherent with the transport and scavenging of gases inside the convective scheme. In this approach the vertical transport of NO inside clouds is calculated by the parameterization of deep convective transport, thus eliminating the need for apriori LiNOx profiles. Once produced inside the convective column, NO molecules are redistributed by updrafts and downd… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the event on 11th May 2012, concentration of NO x started increasing after 18:00 h and reached a maximum hourly mean of 38 ppbv at about 21:00 h, which was greater than the control and monthly mean values (15 ppbv). Similar observations were reported for the formation of NO x in the middle and upper troposphere (Barthe and Barth 2008;Bond et al 2001;Choi et al 2009;Jacobson and Streets 2009;Jourdain et al 2010;Kaynak et al 2008;Labrador et al 2009;Mari et al 2006;Nath et al 2009;Zhang et al 2003). After dissipation of thunderstorm, the increased amount of NO x formed in the upper troposphere was transported downward to the lower troposphere.…”
Section: Variations In Surface O 3 and No X During Thunderstorms In Tsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the event on 11th May 2012, concentration of NO x started increasing after 18:00 h and reached a maximum hourly mean of 38 ppbv at about 21:00 h, which was greater than the control and monthly mean values (15 ppbv). Similar observations were reported for the formation of NO x in the middle and upper troposphere (Barthe and Barth 2008;Bond et al 2001;Choi et al 2009;Jacobson and Streets 2009;Jourdain et al 2010;Kaynak et al 2008;Labrador et al 2009;Mari et al 2006;Nath et al 2009;Zhang et al 2003). After dissipation of thunderstorm, the increased amount of NO x formed in the upper troposphere was transported downward to the lower troposphere.…”
Section: Variations In Surface O 3 and No X During Thunderstorms In Tsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Convective processes are simulated with the Kain-Fritsch-Bechtold's (KFB) scheme of Bechtold et al (2001), and turbulent diffusion is calculated with the scheme by Louis (1979). The LiNO x parametrization is based on Mari et al (2006). In this approach, once produced inside the convective column, NO x molecules are redistributed by upward and downward transport and detrained in the environment and no a priori vertical placement of the emissions is prescribed.…”
Section: Mocagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOCAGE LiNO x mixing ratios maxima are lower (100 pptv) but located at higher altitude (between 120 and 200 hPa) and at almost the same latitude as TM4. In MOCAGE, no vertical placement is prescribed and the NO x emitted within the cloud are transported according to the convective mass fluxes (Mari et al, 2006). The zonal LiNO x maximum (Fig.…”
Section: Impact On the No X Distribution In The Upper Tropospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convective processes are simulated with the Kain-Fritsch-Bechtold's (KFB) scheme of Bechtold et al (2001), and turbulent diffusion is calculated with the scheme by Louis (1979). The LiNO x parametrization is based on Mari et al (2006). In this approach, once produced inside the convective column, NO x molecules are redistributed by upward and downward transport and detrained in the environment and no a priori vertical placement of the emissions is prescribed.…”
Section: Mocagementioning
confidence: 99%