Kavitha and Raghukanth (Acta Geod Geophys 1-33, 2015) proposed an algorithm to forecast the earthquake energy release for the global seismogenic zones. They concluded that ''the developed model is efficient in forecasting the annual earthquake energy release of most of the seismogenic zone''. However, for several representative case studies their predictions not only are significantly smaller than the observations but also have unreasonable uncertainty. This commentary discusses some of the problems associated with the earthquake data selection for the input of modeling, which may improve the accuracy of the earthquake energy prediction.Keywords Earthquake forecasting Á Seismic hazard assessment Á Seismogenic zone Kavitha and Raghukanth (2015) proposed a time-independent algorithm to forecast the earthquake energy release for the global seismogenic zones on the basis of the global seismicity catalog and the plate boundary model. Such an algorithm seems be useful to determine the most likely moment magnitude and assess the seismic hazard for a specific region. However, for several temporal or spatial cases in their modeling results, the predicted moment energy release is significantly inconsistent with the data. Taking the 2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku earthquake as an example, the expected magnitude of the Okhotsk-Pacific region is Mw8.1, with a standard deviation of Mw9.1. The predicted moment magnitude is significant smaller than the observation, particularly the estimated uncertainty is unreasonably large. The authors ascribed the low accuracy of the prediction to the complexities This comment refers to the article available at