Regional land planning based on BPNN and space mining technology

Su, Lei; Fu, Linhan

doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05316-5

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the one hand, the development has promoted improvement in people's living standards and made substantial contributions to the social economy. On the other hand, due to urban expansion and increasingly frequent human activities, it has caused high levels of interference with the ecological environment [1], resulting in the continuous shrinkage of the natural ecological space, gradual disordered and dysfunctional ecosystems, an increasingly imbalanced proportion of territorial space patterns and structures, and continuously intensified conflicts between various types of functional spaces [2][3][4]. All types of territorial resource utilization problems similar to those mentioned above Land 2023, 12,1989 2 of 26 caused by the extensive mode of economic development in the past are dilemmas that all countries in the world are facing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal Allocation of Territorial Space in the Minjiang River Basin Based on a Double Optimization Simulation Model

Wang,

Zhou,

Xia

et al. 2023

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The unequal distribution of territorial space resources stands out as a leading cause of the human–land contradictions and environmental degradation. These issues are especially pronounced in the Minjiang River Basin, which exhibits significant regional disparities. In pursuit of solutions to these pressing problems and the identification of sustainable developmental pathways, this study presents an innovative territorial space double optimization simulation model. This model integrates quantity structure optimization and distribution pattern optimization, in order to comprehensively consider the optimization of territorial space allocation and build a new territorial space pattern for the Minjiang River Basin in 2030. On this basis, we employed the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model and scenario analysis method to design the double optimization scenario and natural development scenario. By comparing these two scenarios, and calculating the ecological benefits (EB), economic benefits (ECB), carbon storage (CS), and comprehensive benefits (CB) achieved in different scenarios, the validity of the double optimization model was fully verified. The results indicated that: ① the loss of sub-ecological space (PeS) under the natural development scenario was significantly larger than that under the double optimization scenario, and the loss should be mainly attributed to the large expansion of production space (PS) and living space (LS); ② the area of ecological space (ES) has reduced since 2020, but less area was lost and the retention rate was higher under the double optimization scenario; ③ the natural development scenario made the research region gain more ECB, but it also resulted in the loss of more EB and CS, whereas the Minjiang River Basin under the double optimization scenario was able to effectively balance the relationship among the three, thus achieving the best CB. The research findings provide strong scientific support for alleviating the human–land contradictions, protecting the ecological security in the basin, and promoting the sustainable development of the region.

show abstract