2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-022-02176-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple scenarios-based on a hybrid economy–environment–ecology model for land-use structural and spatial optimization under uncertainty: a case study in Wuhan, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the expected demand and the actual space allocated in the study area was calculated using the adaptive inertia coefficient. On that basis, site-specific development trends that contradicted the expected demand were automatically adjusted and thus corrected in the next iteration [34,35,67]. The formula is as follows:…”
Section: 14 X For Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the expected demand and the actual space allocated in the study area was calculated using the adaptive inertia coefficient. On that basis, site-specific development trends that contradicted the expected demand were automatically adjusted and thus corrected in the next iteration [34,35,67]. The formula is as follows:…”
Section: 14 X For Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through application to landuse simulations [20][21][22] and urban expansion simulation and urban growth boundary delineation [31][32][33], it has been shown that, at this stage, among the subsequent improvements of multiple cellular automata, the FLUS model integrates a top-down system dynamics model and a bottom-up cellular automata, and establishes adaptive inertia and competition mechanisms to deal with the complex competition and interactions between different land-use types [31], which can better capture the uncertainty and stochasticity of development in the study area. Among the current studies using the FLUS model, Jiang [5], Penny [34] and Ma et al [35] used the FLUS model to study land use and spatial patterns considering natural, economic and cultural factors. Xu [36], Mansour [37] and Ye et al [38] mainly conducted simulations and monitoring in the urban context using the FLUS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cheng et al [30] optimized the spatial structure of mountain-abandoned-mine land reuse by combining system dynamics and the CLUE-S model. Ma et al [31] combined an uncertain mathematical model with the FLUS model to solve the problem of the planning system with uncertainty of the land system and applied it to structural and spatial patterns. The coupled model balances macro policy effects and micro driving mechanisms, so it is widely used in the research of land-use optimization [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al [ 21 ] used CA-Markov and CLUE-S models to predict land use in Changli County, China, in 2028 and to predict the spatial and temporal changes in habitat quality and future development trends constrained by land use in order to provide a scientific basis for regional natural environmental protection and land use planning. Ma et al [ 22 ] used an uncertainty model coupled with a spatial allocation model (GeoSOS-FLUS) to optimize for three different land use scenarios in Wuhan, China, and quantified the inherent uncertainty of land use to determine its optimal spatial distributions. These models were based mainly on historical land use conversion patterns in making predictions and were not capable of optimizing land use patterns for user-specified conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%