Regional inequality of industrial output in china, 1952 to 1990

Abstract

This paper examines regional inequality of industrial output in China from 1952 to 1990. This study reveals that regional inequality was widespread when socialist China was established in 1949. It was reduced in the 1950s as a result of the efforts to develop the interior through the implementation of the First Five Year Plan (1953–57). After that, regional inequality persisted for one‐and‐a‐half decades due mainly to the poor economic returns of the defence‐oriented “Third Front” programme, decentralization, the reorientation of development policies, and the incidence of disruptive political events. Since the launch of economic reforms in 1978, interregional inequality among the eastern, central and western regions has gradually increased. However, interprovincial inequality decreased. The relative decline of the traditionally rich provinces (three municipalities and the northeastern industrial bases) has contributed to the decline of interprovincial inequality. Meanwhile, favourable state policy, local initiatives and foreign investment and trade have stimulated the growth of the coastal provinces of Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shandong, Zhejiang and Fujian, leading to more rapid coastal development and the increase of interregional inequality. The emerging new map of regional development is important to the understanding of regional inequality in post‐Mao China.

Transport Infrastructure, Intra-Regional Inequality and Urban-Rural Divide: Evidence From China’s High-Speed Rail Construction

“…Since the 1960s, China's government has implemented a series of urban-biased heavy industry development strategies to support the development of heavy industry and capital accumulation in urban areas (Zhu, Yu, and He 2020). However, this development is largely based on extracting agricultural surplus (Wei 1998). Several supporting policies were also put forward, including the household registration system and suppressing food staple prices (Chen and Lin 2014).…”

Global Industrial Development: Insights From the Distribution Dynamics Approach for the Post Covid Era

“…Cheong and Wu ( 43 ) also found that the inequality in the secondary industry sector was the principal contributor to regional inequality in China. Wei ( 44 ) examined regional inequality of industrial output in China from 1952 to 1990. The author found that interregional inequality has gradually increased since 1978, but the interprovincial inequality decreased.…”

Comparison of the Impact of Different Economic Patterns on Population Inflows: Evidence from China’s Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang Provinces

“…China's geographic variations and policy differences between provinces result in distinctive paths of economic development, each having different economic patterns. A recent research focus in China [8][9][10][11][12][13] is to identify factors that drive the evolution of regional economic patterns. Typical regional development patterns for the rich provinces comprise three major types: the Sunan (Southern Jiangsu) pattern, characterized by the development of the collective economy; the Wenzhou (coastal Zhejiang) pattern, featured primarily by the private sector; and the Pearl River (coastal Guangdong) pattern, driven mainly by the development of an export-oriented economy [14][15][16][17][18].…”