2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2780394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Growth with Spatial Dependence: A Case Study on Early Italian Industrialization

Abstract: Abstract. This paper estimates a conditional β-convergence model of labour productivity growth in Italy's manufacturing industry during 1871-1911, accounting for spatial dependence. The empirical evidence is based on a recent set of data at provincial (NUTS 3) level on manufacturing value added at 1911 prices, and a new set of data on human and social capital, political participation, and infrastructures. By focusing on a country and a time when the agglomeration forces and spillover effects advocated by the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result contrasts in part with the evidence recently provided by Ciccarelli and Fachin, who found social capital to be an important determinant of regional growth ix -although to a lesser extent than human capital. 50 According to the evidence provided by the present article, the latter is found to be the most prominent factor of economic growth among the ones explored by Stefano Fenoaltea, in line with recent research on the relationship between human capital accumulation and regional inequality. This finding is reinforced by the positive association between the intensity of innovation capabilities concerned, the evidence is consistent with Felice's idea that social capital started to exert and ix It is also worth noting that Ciccarelli and Fachin include variables drawing on electoral franchise in their "social capital" calculations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result contrasts in part with the evidence recently provided by Ciccarelli and Fachin, who found social capital to be an important determinant of regional growth ix -although to a lesser extent than human capital. 50 According to the evidence provided by the present article, the latter is found to be the most prominent factor of economic growth among the ones explored by Stefano Fenoaltea, in line with recent research on the relationship between human capital accumulation and regional inequality. This finding is reinforced by the positive association between the intensity of innovation capabilities concerned, the evidence is consistent with Felice's idea that social capital started to exert and ix It is also worth noting that Ciccarelli and Fachin include variables drawing on electoral franchise in their "social capital" calculations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…18 The most interesting comparison of our results is with a number of empirical works that have been released in the recent years and that use a variety of formal models to tackle the issue of the determinants of industrial production and location in the pre-First World War period. The first one to be mentioned is Ciccarelli and Fachin (2017), in which productivity is explained by human and social capital, political participation and the building of infrastructures. The article finds that there is an absence of dynamic spill over effects, measured as the growth rate of industrial value added in neighbouring provinces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, domestic market potential from Missiaia ( 2016) is used as regressor but only at the regional and not the provincial level. Ciccarelli and Fachin (2017) explain industrial productivity between 1871 and 1911 by human and social capital, political participation, and the building of infrastructure. The absence of dynamic spillover effects, measured as the growth rate of industrial value added in neighbouring provinces, is seen as evidence that market access was not a driving force behind the first industrialization of Italy.…”
Section: Economic Dualism In Unified Italymentioning
confidence: 99%