2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2004.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional fleet design in truckload trucking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…); the extent drivers return home (Min and Lambert ; Taylor et al. ); driver relationships with dispatchers (Keller and Ozment ; Suzuki et al. ); use of realistic job previews (LeMay and Taylor ); availability of desirable equipment (Garver et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…); the extent drivers return home (Min and Lambert ; Taylor et al. ); driver relationships with dispatchers (Keller and Ozment ; Suzuki et al. ); use of realistic job previews (LeMay and Taylor ); availability of desirable equipment (Garver et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the costs motor carriers incur to replace drivers (Suzuki 2007), the majority of research has examined factors that predict driver turnover. These include driver pay, equitable distribution of pay, and other financial benefits (LeMay et al 1993;Stephenson and Fox 1996;Keller 2002;Min and Lambert 2002;Garver et al 2008;Suzuki et al 2009); the extent drivers return home (Min and Lambert 2002;Taylor et al 2006); driver relationships with dispatchers (Keller and Ozment 1999;Suzuki et al 2009); use of realistic job previews (LeMay and Taylor 1988); availability of desirable equipment (Garver et al 2008); scheduling of drivers' work (Min and Lambert 2002;de Croon et al 2004); driver autonomy (Stephenson and Fox 1996); driver demographics (Beilock and Capelle 1990); top management support (Williams et al 2011); and perceived justice with mandates to adopt onboard technologies (Cantor et al 2011).…”
Section: Driver Turnover and Consequences Of Collective Frontline Opementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in Section 2.1, the star dispatch simulation model was run and results were compared to appropriate lane, regional, and pipeline scenarios examined in Taylor et al (1999Taylor et al ( , 2006Taylor et al ( , 2009. In all validating runs, no statistically significant difference was observed between the star model results and the results from previous models for any metric or driver type.…”
Section: Validation Results and Baseline Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The star model is run with OTR only, with OTR and regional dispatching only, with OTR and lane dispatching only, and with OTR and pipeline dispatching only. Results are compared to results from appropriate models in Taylor et al (1999Taylor et al ( , 2006Taylor et al ( , 2009.…”
Section: Validation and Baseline Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation