2018
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in type 2 diabetes treatment and outcomes in Germany—An analysis of the German DPV and DIVE registries

Abstract: Federal states in Germany are heterogeneous concerning diabetes treatment and associated outcomes. These data should stimulate further discussion about how optimal diabetes care can be implemented in all areas of Germany, to achieve good treatment outcomes in all federal states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggested that treatment strategies with DPP-4is were increasingly preferred for newly diagnosed diabetes over strategies with sulfonylureas, confirming previous reports on populations of known diabetes cases in general practices (2008-2016) [8] and in outpatient clinics in Germany (2014-2016) [9]. Also, the observed downward trends in dispensation frequencies of both monotherapy and combination therapy with sulfonylureas had been previously observed in general practice [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data suggested that treatment strategies with DPP-4is were increasingly preferred for newly diagnosed diabetes over strategies with sulfonylureas, confirming previous reports on populations of known diabetes cases in general practices (2008-2016) [8] and in outpatient clinics in Germany (2014-2016) [9]. Also, the observed downward trends in dispensation frequencies of both monotherapy and combination therapy with sulfonylureas had been previously observed in general practice [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since this study only reported how frequently a certain drug had been prescribed in total, without distinguishing between specific mono-and combination therapies, a further comparison of distinct treatment strategies was not possible. The study that reported on glucose-lowering therapy in German outpatient clinics had not analyzed treatment patterns at multiple time points [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 6 7 10 11 Despite its consideration later in therapy, insulin is still common in the treatment of type 2 diabetes worldwide, ranging from 30% to 40%. 37 42 Insulin showed no significant changes from 2012 to 2018 ( figure 1 ), and insulin is still the second most common antidiabetic drug ( table 2 ) in the DRT. 28 Although insulin and sulfonylureas share a higher risk for hypoglycemia, sulfonylurea prescriptions were decreasing while insulin remained stable ( figure 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since 2012, metformin has shown strong increases, is the most prevalent drug and is more often used in younger patients. [34][35][36][37][38] Since the last DRT publication data have shown that metformin is now the most prevalent antidiabetic medication throughout every age group. 28 Approval in CKD, decreased CV mortality in monotherapy and combination therapy, same glycemic results as glitazones and sulfonylureas, higher effectiveness than gliptins, increasing long-term data and physician experience made metformin applicable to all age groups and substantiated the increase in use of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Metforminmentioning
confidence: 99%