1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)83340-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional differences in myogenic and neurogenic properties of rabbit sphincter of Oddi smooth muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lonovics et al (1994) have shown that the distal region of the rabbit SO predominantly exhibits NO-mediated relaxations on electrical stimulation, in comparison with the proximal SO. Similarly, electrophysiological studies in the guinea-pig SO suggest a greater inhibitory activity in the distal region (Vongalis et al 1989), although Parkman et al (1998) have reported that the NO pathway is more prominent proximally. The present study has demonstrated differences in the density of putative inhibitory neurons, namely those co-localising NOS and/or VIP immunoreactivity between the different regions of the SO.…”
Section: Vip Within the So And Duodenum And Its Co-localisation With Nosmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lonovics et al (1994) have shown that the distal region of the rabbit SO predominantly exhibits NO-mediated relaxations on electrical stimulation, in comparison with the proximal SO. Similarly, electrophysiological studies in the guinea-pig SO suggest a greater inhibitory activity in the distal region (Vongalis et al 1989), although Parkman et al (1998) have reported that the NO pathway is more prominent proximally. The present study has demonstrated differences in the density of putative inhibitory neurons, namely those co-localising NOS and/or VIP immunoreactivity between the different regions of the SO.…”
Section: Vip Within the So And Duodenum And Its Co-localisation With Nosmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regional differences in the distribution of inhibitory neurons within the SO A number of studies in the guinea-pig, rabbit and possum indicate that the distal and proximal regions of the SO display different patterns of motor activity (Vongalis et al 1989;Lonovics et al 1994;Parkman et al 1998). The mechanisms underlying these regional differences have not been elucidated.…”
Section: Vip Within the So And Duodenum And Its Co-localisation With Nosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence is accumulating that the possum biliary‐SO may be composed of at least two SO regions, the proximal‐SO and distal‐SO, which respond differently to chemical and electrical stimuli in electrophysiological and in vitro functional studies (Lonovics et al 1994; Parkman et al 1998; Woods et al 2000). Two studies in guinea pig (Vongalis et al 1989; Hirose & Ito, 1991) have identified three neurally distinct SO regions that appear to correspond to the proximal‐SO, body‐SO and papilla‐SO regions described in this current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of functional and electrophysiological studies in American opossum, guinea‐pig, rabbit and Australian possum have indicated that the distal (juxta duodenum) and proximal segments of the SO (distal‐SO and proximal‐SO respectively) can display different activities in response to various bioactive agents or neural stimulation 11–20 . Interestingly, immunohistochemical and receptor binding studies found polarized distributions for substance P receptors and a gradient of nitric oxide (NO) synthase innervation in the SO 12–14 which may explain some of the different responses by these regions of the SO. There is also controversy as to whether the bile duct and pancreatic duct components of the SO can also display independent activities 11,15–17 …”
Section: So Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%