2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-6672(07)60018-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Bus Timetabling Model with Synchronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example is presented in Liu et al (2007), where the Downloaded from informs.org by [128.122.253.212] on 21 July 2015, at 05:40 . For personal use only, all rights reserved.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is presented in Liu et al (2007), where the Downloaded from informs.org by [128.122.253.212] on 21 July 2015, at 05:40 . For personal use only, all rights reserved.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] considered the problem of minimizing waiting times when travel time between stops is random and services have fixed headways. Several other works that study coordination have employed meta heuristic approaches to solve the general problem [12,6,5,11,10] using methods such as genetic algorithms, tabu search, and local search. The approach presented herein is similar in spirit to [2] who present a Lagrangian-based heuristic that seeks to optimize one line at a time.…”
Section: Schedule Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the authors considered criteria such as minimizing the fleet size, minimizing the number of lines that a bus is assigned to, minimizing the deadhead costs, and minimizing the idle times of buses waiting for the next trip. Liu and Shen [27] integrate the Transit Network Timetabling presented by Liu et al [28] and a multiple deport vehicle scheduling problem minimizing the number of buses and deadhead costs. To solve the problem, the authors develop a Bi-level Nesting Tabu Search which is implemented in a small example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%