2005
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional Brain Changes in Aging Healthy Adults: General Trends, Individual Differences and Modifiers

Abstract: Brain aging research relies mostly on cross-sectional studies, which infer true changes from age differences. We present longitudinal measures of five-year change in the regional brain volumes in healthy adults. Average and individual differences in volume changes and the effects of age, sex and hypertension were assessed with latent difference score modeling. The caudate, the cerebellum, the hippocampus and the association cortices shrunk substantially. There was minimal change in the entorhinal and none in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

185
1,959
25
23

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,456 publications
(2,225 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
185
1,959
25
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Manual measurements of intracranial volume or the use of height/body mass index as a proxy for the intracranial volume can be unreliable for the elderly population (Rosano et al, 2007). Moreover, different gray matter structures (frontal areas, medial temporal areas) have a non-linear age-related variability, rendering the use of the whole gray matter volume as control less accurate (Raz et al, 2005). AlsoFin this specific sampleFthe whole brain was larger in the depressed subjects than in the comparison subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Manual measurements of intracranial volume or the use of height/body mass index as a proxy for the intracranial volume can be unreliable for the elderly population (Rosano et al, 2007). Moreover, different gray matter structures (frontal areas, medial temporal areas) have a non-linear age-related variability, rendering the use of the whole gray matter volume as control less accurate (Raz et al, 2005). AlsoFin this specific sampleFthe whole brain was larger in the depressed subjects than in the comparison subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We suggest that these effects may in some cases be overestimated, particularly in certain brain locations, by the inclusion of biased estimates from T1w structural scans with motion artifacts. The present work leveraged the variability in head motion and morphometry in a healthy adult sample to show that: (1) independent estimates of motion significantly predicted GM thickness (independent of age and gender), and (2) motion slightly but significantly biased thickness estimates in several regions that are often highlighted to undergo cortical thinning with increasing age [e.g., medial PFC, cingulate cortex, precuneus, IFG and anterior insula, SMG, lateral temporal cortex; Fjell et al, 2009; Lemaitre et al, 2012; Raz et al, 2005; Salat et al, 2004; Storsve et al, 2014]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when examining the sample split by gender, the negative association only remained for the women. Although the propensity of the literature supports similar age‐related hippocampal volume loss for men and women (Jack et al., 2015; Mu, Xie, Wen, Weng, & Shuyun, 1999; Raz et al., 2004, 2005), there are reports of both women‐ and men‐specific age–hippocampal volume relationships (Murphy et al.,1996; Pruessner et al., 2001). For the current sample, the lack of significant association in the men may be explained by this gender not experiencing a similar age‐related trajectory in hippocampal volume, and therefore not experiencing the benefits of CRF on hippocampal volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%