2002
DOI: 10.2527/2002.802429x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional and processor variation in the ileal digestible amino acid content of soybean meals measured in growing swine

Abstract: To assess differences in soybean meal quality related to region of production, researchers in Illinois, Kansas, North Carolina, The Netherlands, and Ohio collected four soybean meal samples processed locally at least 15 d apart. These samples were assayed for ileal amino acid digestibility by pigs using a common soybean meal and a soy protein concentrate as references, and a low-protein casein diet for determination of endogenous amino acid losses. Digestibility was determined at each university using seven ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
7
23
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The soybean meal diets were supplemented with 0, 0.05, or 0.10% of CS. The lowprotein casein diet was used to measure endogenous protein loss as previously described [9,[22][23][24] based on an assumption that casein itself is 100% digestible at a low inclusion level [5].…”
Section: Experimental Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soybean meal diets were supplemented with 0, 0.05, or 0.10% of CS. The lowprotein casein diet was used to measure endogenous protein loss as previously described [9,[22][23][24] based on an assumption that casein itself is 100% digestible at a low inclusion level [5].…”
Section: Experimental Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent and standardized digestibilities were calculated as previously described by van Kempen et al [24]. Endogenous amino acid losses determined using the low-protein casein diet were used to calculate standardized digestibility.…”
Section: Calculations and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos comparando FS produzidos em diferentes países indicaram que sua composição química e valor energético são variáveis ( VAN KEMPEN et al, 2002;KARR-LILIENTHAL et al, 2005).…”
unclassified
“…Por un efecto asociativo, la digestibilidad de otros elementos, se ve también beneficiada y se logra mejorar la digestión de la energía (2,3,4) y de los aminoácidos (5,6) . En la producción de cerdos, el incremento en el aprovechamiento del fósforo es suficiente para justificar el uso de las fitasas y el impacto en la disponibilidad de energía es de consideración (2,4) , mientras que, en el caso de los aminoácidos, los beneficios son cuestionables (7,8,9) porque la magnitud de mejoría en los coeficientes de digestibilidad es relativamente pequeña y muy variable (10) , dependiendo del ingrediente, de la dieta y del aminoácido de que se trate (11,12,13) .…”
unclassified
“…Por ejemplo, el incremento promedio en la digestibilidad ileal verdadera o estandarizada de todos los aminoácidos esenciales por efecto de fitasa, puede estar en el orden de 3.5 unidades porcentuales (12,14,15) , pero el coeficiente de variación (CV) de la digestibilidad inherente llegar a más del 30 % (12) . En la práctica, no se pondera la variación por la potencial liberación de aminoácidos a la acción de las fitasas y normalmente se asignan valores matriciales, lo que equivale a una reducción fija de la demanda y, por lo tanto, del aporte de nutrientes por los ingredientes, que redunda en un ahorro en el costo de las dietas.…”
unclassified