2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional and net economic impacts of high-rise mass timber construction in Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of CLT in mass timber building costs $409 per m 2 floor area (0.21 m 3 of CLT per m 2 floor area), accounting 18% of total building construction cost. It is worth noting that the price range of CLT is relatively wide due to its early adoption status and nature as specialized product in building sector [17]. This current work modeled the LCCA using the glulam prices in RSMeans database [39] as a proxy for CLT, (e.g., $1440 per m 3 of CLT, construction labor/equipment cost of $219 per m 3 , and overhead of $260 per m 3 ), which is on the high end for CLT price.…”
Section: Cross Laminated Timbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of CLT in mass timber building costs $409 per m 2 floor area (0.21 m 3 of CLT per m 2 floor area), accounting 18% of total building construction cost. It is worth noting that the price range of CLT is relatively wide due to its early adoption status and nature as specialized product in building sector [17]. This current work modeled the LCCA using the glulam prices in RSMeans database [39] as a proxy for CLT, (e.g., $1440 per m 3 of CLT, construction labor/equipment cost of $219 per m 3 , and overhead of $260 per m 3 ), which is on the high end for CLT price.…”
Section: Cross Laminated Timbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there has been great interest in mass timber buildings in the Pacific Northwest, due in large part to the cost savings and regional economic benefits associated with local production of the mass timber products. Scouse and others [17] showed the local or regional economic benefits of mass timber over a comparable traditional concrete include direct and indirect jobs and economic growth, when CLT is locally sourced from regional manufacturers. Drivers for increasing MTC include both environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) benefits [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson, Freres Lumber Co., Inc., International Beams, Katerra, SmartLam, Sterling Solutions, and Vaagen Timbers. (Scouse et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus necessary to unify both the functions and costs including the use of the surplus in order to examine the regional economic impact of the timber dam in comparison with the concrete dam. However, our previous study [19] and existing literature [20] did not consider these necessary aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding the use of wood for the construction of check dams, certain studies in the literature have evaluated life-cycle CO 2 emissions [15,16], estimated the potential for wood use and reduction in greenhouse gas emission [17], and calculated the structural stability [18]. However, with the exception of our previous study [19], no study has investigated the economic impact of timber dams, although a prior research has evaluated the economic impact of using timber as building material [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%