2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region-of-interest analyses of one-dimensional biomechanical trajectories: bridging 0D and 1D theory, augmenting statistical power

Abstract: One-dimensional (1D) kinematic, force, and EMG trajectories are often analyzed using zero-dimensional (0D) metrics like local extrema. Recently whole-trajectory 1D methods have emerged in the literature as alternatives. Since 0D and 1D methods can yield qualitatively different results, the two approaches may appear to be theoretically distinct. The purposes of this paper were (a) to clarify that 0D and 1D approaches are actually just special cases of a more general region-of-interest (ROI) analysis framework, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our analysis identified specific deviant parts of the movement pattern, i.e., clusters, which may help establishing the basis for further studies. Combining these identified clusters (regions of interest, Pataky et al, 2016a ), possibly together with spatiotemporal parameters and extracted scalars will permit further hypothesis driven research. Moreover, the implementation of dimensionality reduction tool [Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), or kernel Principal Component Analysis (kPCA)] and/or machine learning tools [Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), or Self-Organizing Maps (SOM)] would be of interest to classify movement patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our analysis identified specific deviant parts of the movement pattern, i.e., clusters, which may help establishing the basis for further studies. Combining these identified clusters (regions of interest, Pataky et al, 2016a ), possibly together with spatiotemporal parameters and extracted scalars will permit further hypothesis driven research. Moreover, the implementation of dimensionality reduction tool [Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), or kernel Principal Component Analysis (kPCA)] and/or machine learning tools [Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), or Self-Organizing Maps (SOM)] would be of interest to classify movement patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, a FFT method was used, where the original vector was transformed to the Fourier domain and then transformed back with desired data points (here 100, representing 100% of completion time). In addition, data was processed with the open source SPM code by Pataky ( 2016 ) for two-tailed paired t -tests. The critical test statistic threshold that retained a family-wise error rate of α = 0.05 was calculated as described by Pataky et al ( 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the example of running gait, high frequency content in ground reaction force at foot-strike and then lower frequency content throughout the rest of the stance phase). Additionally, as SPM and SnPM treats data as a vector of points, these approaches are more flexible for a priori selection of important regions of interest (ROI) on a waveform 33 , and allows for hypothesis testing to take place on these ROIs (thus influencing statistical power), rather than the whole vector. This is not possible within FDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a cautionary point for the potential user of SPM or SnPM however, choosing smaller regions within a waveform will change the critical t-threshold for a given alpha level (as the smoothness of the curve will change, thus influencing the outcomes of RFT). Researchers, therefore, must have a strong rationale for pre-selection of a section of a movement to be analysed, as the results of an ROI analysis will likely change, when compared to SPM or SnPM being applied to the entire time-series 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%