2005
DOI: 10.1191/0309132505ph572pr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Region and place: devolved regional government and regional economic success?

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many ways, a self‐contained and endogenous view of regions and regional development can no longer hold water in this world economy characterized by increasingly interdependent economic activities that are organized through cross‐border value chains and production networks spearheaded and governed by global lead firms. Echoing Hudson's (, p. 620) relational view (see also Yeung , ), I believe that regions should be “seen as constituted from spatialized social relations, stretched out over space and materialized in various forms, and representational narratives about them”. These value chains and production networks are organizational platforms through which actors in different regional and national economies compete and co‐operate for a greater share of the creation, transformation, and capture of value through transnational economic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In many ways, a self‐contained and endogenous view of regions and regional development can no longer hold water in this world economy characterized by increasingly interdependent economic activities that are organized through cross‐border value chains and production networks spearheaded and governed by global lead firms. Echoing Hudson's (, p. 620) relational view (see also Yeung , ), I believe that regions should be “seen as constituted from spatialized social relations, stretched out over space and materialized in various forms, and representational narratives about them”. These value chains and production networks are organizational platforms through which actors in different regional and national economies compete and co‐operate for a greater share of the creation, transformation, and capture of value through transnational economic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It could also feed into the debate on devolution and regional development in England, where the uneasy relationship between 'territorialised' economic policy instruments and regional economic development is already receiving attention (e.g. Hudson, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HUDSON, 2007;JONES and MACLEOD, 2004;MACLEOD and JONES, 2007). Also, HUDSON (2005) seems to echo the above-mentioned point made by Amin concerning local (regional) politics as a field of agonistic engagement when he notes that we should rethink regions as the products of agonistic politics.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 91%