2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.04.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regeneration of thin-film composite membrane used for permeation of hexane vapors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is shown in Figure 7A, the permeability of n ‐hexane vapour was decreased since some n ‐hexane vapour condensed before receiving to the cold trap and later weighing for flux calculation. [ 85 ] In other words, at lower membrane's permeate side pressures of −500 and −865 mbar compared to that of −200 mbar due to the lower solubility/condensability of n ‐hexane molecules in the membrane material, solubility‐selectivity term of the membrane reduces and lowers n ‐hexane vapour passage through the membrane. The same behaviour was observed for the higher feed flow rate of 173 mL · min −1 at the highest permeate side pressure of −200 mbar; however, in this case, the permeabilities are higher.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is shown in Figure 7A, the permeability of n ‐hexane vapour was decreased since some n ‐hexane vapour condensed before receiving to the cold trap and later weighing for flux calculation. [ 85 ] In other words, at lower membrane's permeate side pressures of −500 and −865 mbar compared to that of −200 mbar due to the lower solubility/condensability of n ‐hexane molecules in the membrane material, solubility‐selectivity term of the membrane reduces and lowers n ‐hexane vapour passage through the membrane. The same behaviour was observed for the higher feed flow rate of 173 mL · min −1 at the highest permeate side pressure of −200 mbar; however, in this case, the permeabilities are higher.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%